Spitzer, Hauer, Kroll, and Silverstein - Sander Hicks' Latest BS Stunt?

Stumbled upon this "tellingly over the top" post on the internets:

http://www.iraq-war.ru/article/158919

It is basically a reprint (with some "jew-hatred" thrown in for effect) of a New York Megaphone article by Hicks.

Now, a few things to note... Sander Hicks is beyond question a bullshit artist and disinfo shill. The only thing I'm confused about is where this particular entry of his falls on the spectrum that ranges from total bullshit on the one side, the kind of stuff we will look like idiots if we repeat, and the partly if not mostly if not entirely true stuff that is intended as bait to lure people in for the later sucker punch (the going Fetzal part.)

Another thing that I think smells a little fishy is the fact that the Harvard Crimson has just reported that Kroll has just been contracted by harvard to help mitigate the potential damage caused by a recent high profile hacking incident--which is how I stumbled on this story, I was double checking what role Kroll is alleged to have played in 9/11 (mostly IMO by disinfo shills.)

Maybe someone thinks that Harvard's problematic 9/11 guy is going to make a fool of himself by seizing on this association of Harvard with Kroll to go off on some Hicks-fed series of accusations which will discredit him in the end?  If so, I have to say how comforting it would be, to think how utterly clueless the person whose idea it was is!

The lesson here of course is to keep our message simple and focused on the undeniable physical evidence of demolitions, not tangled webs of suspicion and, yes, conspiracy!