Explosives Pre-Positioned For Your Safety Revisited

gretavo's picture

In a previous post, Casseia identified an article posted on some Swedish website and subsequently linked to on 911Blogger that proposed the ridiculous concept of tall buildings being prepared for demolition secretly "just in case" it was necessary to demolish them on top of hundreds of people in order to save, um, to save, uhhh... In any case, this alleged secret "explophylactic" project, allegedly codenamed Godzilla, is clearly part of a limited hangout solution being floated by the perps and their apologists to somehow "explain away" the fact that, well, yes, the towers and building 7 WERE demolished with explosives.

RT's left gatekeeper friends had previously suggested this to him as a plausible explanation over a year ago but it was still somewhat surprising to see the anti-truth crowd play this card given how little chance it has of convincing anyone. More surprised yet was RT when last night in Harvard Square he was chatted up by none other than Bob Avakian, the Chairman of the Revolutionary Communist Party (he did not identify himself but RT rarely forgets a face...) The RCP has a bookstore/HQ in Harvard Square, and though Chairman Bob's whereabouts are perpetually listed as unknown, he apparently makes it into town now and again.

What was even stranger still is that Chairman Bob, who actually seems like a very intelligent man as well as a charming conversationalist in a "man of the people" way suggested to RT that he was aware of the 9/11 lie but that a good way to expose people to it is by suggesting to them that after the 1993 WTC bombing it was decided for safety reasons to rig the buildings to be demolished "just in case". He was not clear on whether he actually believed this himself or whether he saw it the way that people claimed to see LIHOP in the past as a kind of "gateway position". I don't think it really matters, since what we're interested in here is meta-discourse analysis. Suffice it to say that a) the Godzilla theory is in play and b) someone felt strongly enough to send Chairman Bob personally, if incognito, to suggest it to RT.

RT and the Chairman chatted for approximately half an hour before both had to hop onto their respective public transportations. The discussion ranged from 9/11, the moon landings, and consciousness awakening to evolutionary biology and the relationship of altruism to genetics and though there wasn't too much meeting of the minds it was a pleasant chat.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
LIHOPopotamus's picture

sounds plausible to me!

that's why they Let It Happen On Purpose!!

petros's picture

Chairman Bob

 

Thanks for writing about this subject. I have a few things to add.

Here's a short thingie about "Chairman Bob".

I know a small number of people who have been members and supporters of
the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA (RCP), and I've worked with some
of them on various anti-war and radical mobilizations in the past. In
general, they're very good people, honest in their desire for Peace and
Justice and committed to the struggle for a Socialism with a human
face. But the RCP membership's relationship to Chairman Bob has been
oscillating from dignified to ridiculous.

I've seen with my own eyes groups
of RCP members lined up and marching behind a giant poster of Bob's
photo in truly ridiculous imitation of the "personality cult" campaigns
that RCP tried to import to the US from Mao-worshipping era in China.
I'm a lot more forgiving and flexible when it comes to accepting some
(limited) positive role that the "personality cult" campaigns for Mao
generated (at that place and time, in that political context in
China), than I am of RCP's crude imitations worshipping Chairman
Bob.

Especially when Chairman Bob's main work these days is titled:

"Away With All Gods!
Unchaining the Mind and Radically Changing the World
"

I
wish that the Party could apply that approach first to its own members.
Removing any vestiges of personality worship will help them become
better participants in the struggle for Socialism.

Petros
http://petros-evdokas.cyprus-org.net/Another-sort-of-Introduction.html
________

kate of the kiosk's picture

better pulse

would like to get a better pulse on this blog's participants'  thoughts and theories regarding the pre-preparation/placement of demolition explosives in wtc 1, 2, and 7...we know they were prewired, but when?

is it really implausible to think that setup for demo might have been implemented after 93? might there not have been "agents" involved at that time, and then agent follow- through operatives handling "last minute" preparations/modifications closer to countdown. where to go for this...

I don't even think it has to be LIHOP.

eagerly await and anticipate more "Wired for Terror" takes on this aspect of 9/11 from Lazlo Toth!

 

Tahooey's picture

check my pulse, it don't change

My opinion is that explosives were probably placed within the six months or so preceding 9-11.

I think the goal of '93 was also to cause a larger collapse by taking out some critical lower supports (probably the same asbestos issues to worry about then too). If so, the effort failed miserably and perhaps the planners made sure it wouldn't (not) happen again and is why the number and power of explosives used on 9-11 were so excessively devastating.

Collapse?? Those buildings were blown to smithereens.