Ron Paul's Right Wing detractors

Yikes! How surreal is this? Ron Paul is a pseudo-truth candidate, meaning his cult on 911blogger try to convince us he's our savior. Why? Maybe so that their co-conspirators can spread stuff like this?

http://www.red-alerts.com/un-american-activities/more-ron-paul-supporter...

More Ron Paul Supporters He Won’t Want You to See
Posted in Un-American activities, Homeland Security, Islamic Expansionism by Rob Taylor on the June 21st, 2007

Here’s a blog that recently railed against the Republican effort to “marginalize” the Messiah of half-baked libertarianism. But look around and you’ll see that these Ron Paul supporters aren’t disgruntled Republicans at all, but instead are a collection of Jihadis, anti-Semites and pro-terror propagandists.

Why does Ron Paul garner support and admiration from a collection of America haters like this? The answer is simple, his policies will benefit them. His isolationism will allow these people to fulfill their dream of the extermination of the Jewish people and the destruction of America. Ron Paul may sincerely believe that if we “just leave them alone” we can avoid conflict with militant islamists, communists and other fascists, but his supporters in those movements prove him wrong, they’re lists of grievances are vast, childish and ultimately unanswerable because in most cases they’re based on outrageous conspiracy theories.

As one radical Muslim who owns a pro-jihad site stated in my comments on this post:

its interesting that the barbarians are calling us barbarians.

those people who were oppressing Muslims from 300 years, when some courageous people strike back on them, then they are crying and barking and calling us barbarians…

your governments never think that we can actually fight back thats why they kept oppressing our people for centuries and now its time to pay back.

soon the world will see the destruction of UK and USA from our hands

and thats a promise

enjoy your defeat loosers

The comment was edited for brevity, but notice the flaw in his logic? He’s implying the United States has been oppressing Muslims for 300 years even though the U.S. is not yet 300 years old. The U.K. may have been “oppressing” Muslims 300 years ago although you could argue that point, but notice his reparation for 300 years of oppression is not us having good relations with the Islamic world now, but our destruction. You’ll also note that Iraq is the last item of a list of imaginary grievances that extend some three centuries.

Hopefully Ron Paul will one day take note of this as well