Help Please My Head Hurts

He was suffering from flattened affect.

don't you have any respect for people who put their bodies up against the gears of the machine? I make a point of NEVER reading the "site that shall not be named true faction" but I be they don't appreciate you mocking one of their stars. do you think it's EASY to see all your fake truthing fall to crap around you as the realization sinks in that no, you aren't as smart as you thought you were, and that the people you work for didn't have it all figured out? I bet they're feeling a bit nervous and frayed at the edges about now, Adam, considering how well documented their farce is. From trying to squelch discussion and publicization of the demolition of the WTC to the pushing of the official BS about real hijackings and the attempts to frame *other* muslims, even a dimwit will be able to figure out what their scheme was all along once the truth is widely known, which it will be before long. Don't you get it, Adam? They're F***CKED! They don't appreciate your making light of their screwedness, OK?

If I had been there and heard and seen all those bombs going off all over the building I might have guessed they were going to be coming down--the proper question would be WHY were the columns buckling, not WERE the columns buckling. I have argued before that the massive explosion in the basement, by disconnecting many or most of the core columns from the bedrock would have transferred the load to the remaining core columns and the perimeter columns. If you then blew the core columns at the impact zone, that would be the "straw that broke the camels back", or that made the perimeter columns begin to buckle at the impact zone. No mystery here afaict....

The problem for Jon Gold, besides his delusions about hidden Jew Hatred being all around, is Arabs are being slaughtered daily because he and much of America and the world can't bring themselves to admit that the Arab world was BLAMED for the attacks on 9/11/2001. Helping perpetuate this lie is, to me, more disgraceful then what fake losers like ProtStink.org...who have been marginalized for decades and have no real influence what so ever.

The irony here is that there IS anti-Muslim propaganda everywhere. Turn on the TV and watch the history channel, watch National Geographic, watch the religious nuts all attribute 9/11 to the evil Muslims and provide a horrible backdrop of anti-Muslim videos and slick productions.

This lie has killed over 500,000 people in the Arab world in just 10 years. Bodies are being added to the pile every day. Reconciling this by pointing out the lie should be a top priority to anyone involved with 9/11 Truth.

Not only does he make the pathetically transparent insinuation that when we say Zionists we really mean "da Joooz" but in addition he flat out admits to being (as a moderator at 911blogger) "on a mission" to "flush out" discussion along this avenue and also to marginalize the Pentagon issue.  Gotta give him props for honesty I suppose! 

And of course he propagandistically lumps the Zionism and Pentagon issues in with "spaces beams" and "no planes [i.e. hologram planes, TV fakery]."

Even though I've been guilty of it, I'm not the biggest fan of name calling, but damn, if it isn't BS like above that makes me say to myself, "And they wonder why people call them True Faction!"

For awhile, I have to admit I was turned off by this site's labeling of certain sites and people as "fake truthers," because it seemed very accusatory and of course at the end of the day you could always be wrong.

For me, it was the whole CIT issue that made me see who was genuine and who wasn't. A year ago at this time, I began to follow their work and I was noticing the ban of discussion of their stuff at truthaction and the "official" consensus there that CIT was "disinfo." I also saw them make the claim that "no serious researcher supported their work." As I was in contact with Craig privately, I knew the up-and-coming "endorsements" would blow that claim right out of the water.

I figured, if these truthaction people are genuine, they'll do a double take and think, "Hmm, these people who are endorsing CIT are not stupid by any stretch.  There must be a very compelling reason why they support this video.  Maybe I should give this NSA presentation a chance and see what it is that compelled these major figures to endorse this, and perhaps re-evaluate my position on the Pentagon."

But instead, once the endorsements were posted, the truthaction cabal redoubled their venom against CIT, barraged the endorsers with angry e-mails pressuring them to retract, and aggressively downvoted anyone who disagreed. 

For Cosmos to call CIT's work "disinfo" and "garbage" even after people like Peter Dale Scott and Richard Gage had endorsed it, absolutely reeks of, well, disinfo and garbage.  I remember Jon Gold posting somewhere that he was so enraged, he instantly e-mailed Peter Dale Scott and the other endorsers, "demanding" an explanation. 

And of course, after the endorsements, the official truthaction line had to turn from "no serious researcher supports them" but instead that "Craig and Aldo are genius level snake oil salesmen who have successfully CONNED Richard Gage and company into endorsing disinfo."

Sorry for the digression away from Zionism and onto CIT, but in light of the post by Rancho Truth that you pasted, in which he declared it his mission to flush out and marginalize the Pentagon issue as well as the Zionism issue, I thought it very instructive especially for our newer readers (I'm looking at you, LillyAnn!) to go down that tangent.

I liked your "playing with the text" Gret. Spot on. 

normally videos starring obnoxious a-holes who like to smell their own sh*t are extremely popular... what gives? and where the hell is that Site Run by Veterans of this Movement™ they promised months ago?

after I had a chance to give his wall a cursory look-see. I wonder how he knew you were discussing it since none of them ever read this site?

Bwahahaha.

And is this the same video that Col. Jenny posted?