Could website functionality improve the effectiveness of, and divisions within 911truth?

There is a widely accepted model for evolutionary change which goes by the catchy title of the Lewontin-Campbell Heuristic. It says that the process of evolution contains three distinct concurrently repeating phases; diversification, selection, and amplification. It applies not only to biological, but any form of evolutionary change including cultural, economic, and political.

Effective Change=Diversity x Advantageous Selection x Amplification

Mass communication greatly enhanced the potential for cultural/political change in one of these three areas, in that it dramatically increased the AMPLIFICATION of selected ideas. However, unless great care is taken to ensure that mass communication reflects the DIVERSITY of human interests, and that the SELECTION process for its content is democratic and based on merit to the majority , then the other two factors affecting the ability to change are compromised, and in fact instead of progress, a cultural anchor is laid down preventing change and dictating homogonous stagnation.

For example, if access to mass communication ended up in the hands of an elite cartel who used it to further their own interests by narrowing the focus of representation, censoring dissent, and amplifying only the ideas selected by themselves which were in their best interests, then this medium would become an effective and powerful tool for preventing change.

People who have seen past this 'Manufacture of Consent' would argue that this is exactly what has happened, and observe that from the off, print was dominated by religious indoctrination for political purposes, and subsequently has generally never improved, although the diversity, technology and sophistication of mass deception serving a minority controlling elite has improved substantially.

It is no surprise to me that under these circumstances the first century of global mass communication also happens to be the most inhumanely cynical and environmentally damaging era in the unimaginably long evolution of humanity since its emergence approximately 6 million years ago.

In 2001 they had become so arrogant and confident of their powers that they carried out the most cynical attempt yet to manipulate humanity, but they made two big mistakes.

Firstly, to further their vested interests and manipulate public opinion (again), they attempted to explain the explosive demolition of 3 WTC asbestos ridden white elephant skyscrapers on the earlier impact of plane crashes, defying the laws of physics which had otherwise remained empirically proven and unchallenged since their discovery.

Secondly they miscalculated their ability to cover it up, because although their mainstream media and co opted politicians have censored the fact that their explanation of the incident has been proven to be untrue and hopelessly compromised at every level, they underestimated the internet as a new source of mass communication and information outside of their control, and the will of a significant and growing percentage of the population who would not let the event be forgotten until they had a reasonable explanation of what happened.

THE INTERNET.

The net radically changes the factors involved in the Lewontin-Campbell Heuristic when compared to broadcast media.

Effective Change=Diversity x advantageous selection x Amplification

DIVERSITY is increased dramatically with every single user having the ability to post their ideas into an unlimited cache of information instead of a privileged few contributing to limited print space or airtime .

The SELECTION process of good ideas is potentially much more efficient, and importantly, democratic,as everyone could be included in the selection process ensuring that selections were representative of and advantageous for the masses.

Potentially AMPLIFICATION is as powerful as print or broadcast media, as long as structures are in place to represent and promote the democratically and inclusively selected best ideas.

To see an example of how this model could work in practice, consider Change.org, and their poll to canvass the top 10 policy ideas to be presented to Obama on inauguration day. Wow, internet democracy in action! Although of course, as it happened, the front runner (911 investigation) was bizarrely retired from the race by the administrators even though it was in 1st place with more than twice the votes of any other issue

http://www.911blogger.com/node/18654

Of course all of these are only potential advantages of the new medium, and the reality (so far) is much more depressing and problematic.

Having not personally had to deal with the complexities of site administration myself, please forgive my arrogance at backseat driving, but I guess that the main issues involved in applying an efficient Lewontin-Campbell Heuristic in political blogging and online democracy are:

1. Disruption and infiltration of the discussions by politically opposite adversaries, idiots, or the uninformed, whereby mere volume of posting by minority view participants could outweigh , bury, and disrupt fair discussion.
2. Degeneration of arguments into personal insults putting off participants in the process.
3. A fair, open, and publicly monitored and approved moderation policy.
4. The required mechanics of a fair democratic selection/voting process, to ensure that each person only had one vote per issue, and did not possess multiple identities.
5. A structure whereby democratically selected ideas are promoted and advanced to higher levels of amplification. (News sites which proportionally and democratically select , reflect and amplify previously selected ideas from all the specialist discussion communities.)

However we are still in the very early days of the new medium. It is the first time ever that humanity possesses a tool sophisticated enough to allow it to break the shackles and manipulation of the controlling elite and their indoctrination.

We know that it is perceived as a powerful threat against the oligarchy, by the way they are now openly fighting back and attempting to neutralize our first ever effective weapon against them.

We already have infiltration and designed strategies against our usage , it has already maimed our potential effectiveness, but we are still here, and if this tactic fails to contain us, we can expect the abolishment of net neutrality(Putting content and prioritization of information into the same hands that own the MSM ie our ISPs) to strike a massive blow against us.

In the mean time is there anything we can do to the functionality and administration of websites to maximize the chances of effective change using the principles of the Lewontin-Campbell Heuristic?