Annoymouse's picture

There is PLENTY of substance

as you well recognise.

Otherwise, why would you have dropped WTC7 Research (a previously well-respected archive) into the toilet by having to claim thousands of imaginary witnesses in support of your ill-gained contention?

Tell us why CIT's dozen best placed witnesses were all mistaken in the same way, Victorinox.
And what follow-up research you've done to confirm or deny, there's a good girl.

Reply