Ms. van Auken, Are You REALLY Looking for Justice for Your Late Husband?

that Ms. van Auken would mention all those perps caught on & around 9/11 if they were 'radical islamofascists' instead of MOSSAD?

Sorry if you can't handle this line of questioning (Just more feigned outrage?), Jon. Someone has to speak for the MILLIONS, and growing, of innocent people in Palestine, Iraq & Afghanistan that have been victimized for years by the real 9/11 perps, and your (and the rest of the controlled truth movement.) silence is deafening.

Jon you have cynically used the family members and I'm sick of seeing it. The manner in which you use them is exactly what I would expect from cointel. You have prominently placed yourself around them and rather than sticking to facts and examining potential motives you divert attention from those things. "They know 1000x more about 9/11 than you will EVER hope to." See this is an emotional argument. There is no substance to it. None. Nada. Zero. That's right, Zilch. You are using their position as family members of victims to attack other people who are focused on facts like Jerome Hauer's involvement in seeding the notion that Bin Laden committed the act. What is not right is pairing yourself with emotional stimuli (victim's family members) and attacking others who are asking APPROPRIATE QUESTIONS regarding Israel's involvement.

BTW, where did you learn to use operant and classical conditioning? I KNOW conditioning and persuasion techniques when I see them.

LVA seems to actually have come around a little bit, as evidenced by her words in this much more recent appearance:

This is the first time I've heard her mention Silverstein, and building 7, and it garnered her biggest round of applause. She also questions the cell phone calls from the planes on 9/11, which implicitly questions the official hijacker narrative, which is good. It's nice to see Jon Gold be so defensive of someone who would seem to disagree with him on so much (Jon believes that Arab muslim hijackers did in fact hijack all the planes that morning, including AA77) But hey, that's how he gets people like Diane the New York Activist to cite him as some kind of well-regarded authority in the movement when he really only knows a lot about Indian allegations of Pakistani involvement in sending emergency pork chop moneygrams to the hijackers who really hijacked planes that morning... Of course I expect about now that JG will be doing some Steve Altenesque "backpeddling" (which is either Alten's way of spelling backpedaling, or involves selling something back to someone...)

Yes, hi, I'd like to return this victim family supporting LIHOP limited hangout shill costume...

Sir, it's been worn--a LOT by the looks of it.

Oh, uh, it's broken in, yes.

Fine... well, I'll see what else we have in, um... this size... let's see, here's a demolition skeptic in a western union uniform...

Perfect, I'll take it!

Hang on, it comes with some pork chops...

Even better.

i was thinking it could also be that because we only ever hear about her from Gold or the MSM that we get a very LIHOPPY picture of her. That's why I posted the more recent speech, because she is much more inline with mainstream truthing in it, and I was impressed and not a little surprised to hear her mention building 7 and Silverstein. my main point is WE DON'T KNOW, so we must be skeptical, perhaps to a fault.