Spiegel Online gate crashed!
Yesterday, SPON published an article concerning the recent WTC-impact simulations out of Purdue University, opening a corresponding thread in their public, moderated forum. While SPON's tenor was "a blow against 'dem pesky conspiracy loons!" as usual, this time, their formerly strict moderation, which used to stop skeptical voices dead in their tracks (posts are only published after review), let through a stunning amount of truth -- including Lucky Larry and Urban Moving Systems.
Frankly, I'm flabbergasted, and not yet sure what to make of this...
am I missing something?
what exactly did the Purdue animation show that has anything to do with the collapse of the towers at free fall speed, with pulverized concrete and molten steel? Or with the many reports of explosions in various places in the towers, including coincidentally timed with the plane strikes?
Of course, it has nothing to do with all that.
I was merely remarking on the corresponding forum entry, in which an incredible amount of valid info was not censored. That sets a precedent for any "renowned" german news source, and is newsworthy as such, methinks.
_________________________________
happiness is either here or nowhere
sorry that was me
Don't get me wrong, Bruce, I got your point about the comments perfectly and I agree. My annoymouse comment was just a general gripe about how people are even trying to use the purdue study against us when it a) is totally theoretical and b) does not disprove demolition...
____
â™
Real Truther
"Truth will have no gods before it.- The belief in truth begins with the doubt of all truths in which one has previously believed."
Friedrich Nietzsche (1844 - 1900)
no problem
yeah, it's weird -- nothing but a handwaving effort.
_________________________________
happiness is either here or nowhere