Treason In America - March 6 & 7, 2010
Treason In America - Mach (sic) 6 & 7, 2010
Saturday, March 6, 2010 - 9am -6pm
Sunday, March 7, 2010 - 10am- 5pm
How Much?
$35 - Pre-order regular weekend pass.
$20 - Pre-order discounted (students, 65+, military, & the unemployed) weekend pass.
$40 - "At the door" regular weekend pass.
$30 - "At the door" discounted (students, 65+, military, & the unemployed) weekend pass.
$25 - "At the door" one-day pass. No pre-order prices available for one-day passes.
The Speakers
Master of Ceremonies (MC) - Jon Gold
Cindy Sheehan - Mother & Activist
Richard Gage, AIA (Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth)
Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer (Able Danger)
Coleen Rowley, Former FBI Agent & Whistleblower,Time Magazine Person of the Year, 2002
Jack Blood, Radio Host (Deadline Live, American Freedom Radio)
Luke Rudkowski, We Are Change, Founder
Jon Gold, 9/11 Researcher, Writer & Activist
Dylan Avery, Filmmaker (Loose Change series)
Korey Rowe, Filmmaker (Loose Change series)
Daniel Sunjata, Actor (F/X, Rescue Me)
Sander Hicks, Writer & Activist
Jonathan Elinoff, Filmmaker (Core of Corruption series)
Manny Badillo, 9/11 Family Member
Bob McIlvaine, 9/11 Family Member
Kyle Hence - Filmmaker (9/11: Press For Truth) & Activist [TENTATIVE]
Possibly others
Movies (Tentative showings of entire films; may be reduced to movie clips depending upon time limitations and speaker events.)
9/11: Press for Truth (2006, 86 minutes)
America: Freedom to Fascism (2005, 105 minutes)
Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup (2009, 99 minutes)
there is only one person on that list worth listening to...
...Richard Gage, and we already know pretty much exactly what he's going to say. Everyone else is either fluff or a bona fide LIHOP shill. Seems this conference is being put on by Jon Gold's friend Betsy Metz as a way of helping him build up some much undeserved credibility...
Jon Gold, writer?
He's more of a cut & paster...
TREASON IN AMERICA
I'M ACTUALLY PERFORMING SATURDAY NIGHT AT THIS EVENT. I'M GOING TO TRY AND PIN SOME OF THESE FOLKS DOWN. IT'S NOT ENOUGH TO SAY 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB. POINT A SPECIFIC FINGER AT SOMEONE. AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED IF YOU DON'T THINK THE MOSSAD WAS INVOLVED YOUR NOT LOOKING HARD ENOUGH FOR THE TRUTH.
well, CAPSman...
I actually think that pointing fingers is best left out of public outreach. what we speculate about and discuss on truth movement sites frequented mainly by people already in the know is a totally different story. also, I very much suspect Mossad was involved, but that isn't to say that the evidence is rock solid--it is in fact mainly cirumstancial and overstating the case isn't very helpful, especially since so many are ready to pounce on anything that sounds even remotely like it is motivated by anti-jewish sentiment. so, I wish you the best of luck, but suggest you be as diplomatic as possible, and understand too that a lot of the people who will be featured are not in fact sincere truthers--not worth wasting too much breath in conversation with...
Sander Hicks
Here's some associations and themes that Sander Hicks likes to use:
Delmart Vreeland
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delmart_Vreeland
Delmart Vreeland was sitting in a Canadian prison and, after the 9/11 Attacks, claims to have attempted to warn of impending terrorists attacks. There are no other witnesses that can corroborate his claims.
I found out about vreeland through the website http://www.guerrillanewsnetwork.com aka gnn.tv (now closed down). There was a big camotion at GNN.tv because this guy Vreeland was obviously full of shit. But Gnn.tv backed Sander Hicks and took a credibility hit for it. Mike Ruppert is also know for his association with Delmart Vreeland.
Who Killed Dr. Graham?
Dr. Graham claims to have seen the alleged hijackers names on brown boxes and the home of someone he thought was suspicious. Read the entire "Graham Report" to really understand how goofy this story is. By the way, there is not a single corroborating witness who can back up this guys claims.
http://sanderhicks.com/graham.html
Here's two write up about Dr. Graham and Sander Hicks:
Dr. Graham's 9/11 - Another Goose Chase By Sander Hicks?
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/557
http://wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/1146
THE BIG WEDDING: 9/11, The Whistle Blowers & The Cover-UP
Randy Glass - Diamond Merchant turned FBI Informant
Operation Diamond Back
http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/main/randyglass.html
Sander Hicks On The 5th Anniversary of the 9/11 Attacks:
Jonathan Elinoff
Core Of Corruption
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19750
Ch.1 - The Story Of Dr. Graham
Beginner's Guide To The New World Order
Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer
Able Danger
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Able_Danger
Center For Advance Defense Studies
Anthony Shaffer
Senior Fellow, "Eternal Communications"
http://www.c4ads.org/anthony.shaffer
Fox News Guest - Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer
http://www.foxnews.com/search-results/m/28136684/soft-security.htm#q=%22...
I hope Gage is aware that he
I hope Gage is aware that he is going to be surrounded by disinfo like Jon Gold and others at that gig.
Manny Badillo, 9/11 Family Member
I'm about 15 mins in and this guy seems sharp. It starts slow but he gets going.
Manny Badillo - 911 Family Members
9/11 Symposium 11/03/07
EDIT: A good place to start is about 5:02 into the video.
i'll def check it out
I've heard of Manny but don't know much about him...
he speaks well...
and spends a good amount of time talking about the fact that the buildings were blown up. it's just too hard to say these days whether someone is sincere or is "saying the right things" while audiences are small as part of a plan to switch gears down the road when the public may be paying much more attention. but i'll give Manny the benefit of the doubt--if he's insincere he's also an amazing actor...
In his first comment about
In his first comment about the LIHOP in America conference, Gold said that people were already criticising him for being all over the program, without actually citing the source of the alleged critique. Now, see below, he again invokes unsourced critics that he claims say "the anti-semites are attending". Who in the list of speakers is an alleged "anti-semite"?? Jack Blood? Is this Gold's way of creating the impression that this conference is somehow on the cutting edge or controversial?
Treason In America Conference: 911, The Wars & Our Broken Constitution
history
Who knows what Gold is talking about. It's probably 100% fabricated in order to deflect ANY critical look at this event and its speakers.
The fact is that some of these speakers fail a fairly easy 911 Truth litmus test.
1. Do they encourage focus on un-proven theories and other unproven goofiness?
2. Do they discourage others from focusing on the most important facts about the attacks on 9/11/2001?
3. Are they known intelligence agents?
4. Do they acknowledge the obvious demolition of WTC 7 or not?
5. Do they have a history of failing this litmus test?
Some of the speakers have a history of failing more then one of these tests.
Sander Hicks
Is Sander 'anti-controlled demolition'? YUP! Sander Hicks has always been 'anti-CD'. He even felt the need to express his anti-demolition attitude on the 5th Anniversary of the 9/11 Attacks and he wasn't modest about it.
Does Hicks encourage us to focus on goofy theories? YUP! Vreeland? Randy Glass? Dr. Graham? All these goose chases drive investigators further and further away from the crime scene.
Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer
Does Anthony Shaffer EVER mention WTC 7? Any serious 911 Truth advocate knows that the demolition of WTC 7 is, absolutely without question, the #1 most important evidence we have.. Maybe Shaffer is using the approach the 911 Commission used and just won't mention it?
Shaffer is also a known intelligence agent.
Jonathan Elinoff
Elinoff starts his movie "Core Of Corruption" off with the story of Dr. Graham which is Sander Hick's most recent goose chase. The fact that anyone would start off their 9/11 Truth movie with such a ridiculous story like "The Murder Of Dr. Graham by Sander Hicks" is enough for me.
Coleen Rowley
What does she think about the single most important event (WTc 7) exposing the 9/11 lie? The comment below is from user USAPatriot at 911Blogger.com whose also a member of dc911Truth.
Afterwards, a few of us from the dc911truth group approached Rowley to ask her where she stood on 9/11 (no camera, unfortunately). She would only go so far as to say we needed a new investigation, that she had signed the petition for it, and she supported the NYC CAN initiative. (She also mentioned Jon Gold…in a good way.)
However, when asked about Richard Gage’s work, the nanothermite paper, and the scientific basis for controlled demolitions, she tensed up, saying she wasn’t a scientist, didn’t have the knowledge, and would need an advanced degree to understand the theories. She held firm and was clearly unwilling to discuss it further.
That was very discouraging. For whatever reason, she would not (publicly) veer from the official script of al Qaeda, the 19 hijackers, Moussaoui and the FBI lapses.
Ray McGovern had the same response. He said he’s looked at the scientific evidence but isn’t convinced that it’s strong enough to support controlled demolitions. Including Building 7, presumably.
This, after a speech about moral courage and the duty to be informed.
It leaves us wondering why these “truthtellers” and “whistleblowers” even bother with events like this. They garner our admiration for having the courage to speak out; they urge us to do likewise. Yet when we do, when many of us risk our own careers and reputations to follow the truth regardless of where it leads, they refuse to go out on that limb with us. Why?
“Unanswered questions” is safe. Saying we need a new investigation is safe. But unless these public figures move beyond that and start using their soapboxes to challenge the official story, with more courage and conviction, nothing will happen. The 9/11 Truth movement will remain stagnant, divided, demoralized -- and contained.
The demolition of WTC 7 is the crime scene. The wtc 7 demolition is OBVIOUS from video evidence ALONE. If 'researchers and activists' can't get it by now then I can't see how we can just stand by and not point this kookiness out. If they promote goofy theories it must be pointed out.
let me play devil's advocate for a moment...
can we say that it is an encouraging sign that folks like Rowley and Schaffer are willing to appear at an event with Richard Gage, whose views are well known?
we could
We could say that. Or we could say that even just one turd in the punch bowl is too much.
Besides, McGovern and Rowley are the least worrisome of the speakers. I'm more curious about how someone like Sander Hicks is able to fly under the radar and get asked to speak at these events? His history is littered with goof ball shit that just slides on down the river and into 9/11 Truth with no real critique by 911Blogger users.
When I see how CIT and The Pentagon have been treated at 911Blogger.com, I have to wonder why they don't chase down Sander Hicks with the same fervor. It makes no sense. Sander's themes are such obvious targets of this same alleged concern about 'theories not backed by facts'. Jon Gold should be tearing apart Sander Hicks goose chase.
right... the distinction as i see it is...
is the possibility, however remote, that Rowley and Schaffer are genuinely unaware or unconvinced of the strength of the evidence for CD, such that they have not wanted to go out on a limb personally. on the other hand, everything we know about Sander Hicks suggests strongly that he is a professional disinfo artist, and probably not working for the US government in my opinion...
you think?
"is the possibility, however remote, that Rowley and Schaffer are genuinely unaware or unconvinced of the strength of the evidence for CD"
An FBI agent and an Army Intel officer haven't picked up on the desctruction of WTC 7 after all these years? Yea, it's possible and I'll hold out for that.
On another note, does Rowley remind anyone else of Sara Palin?
as remote as...
...the control of the planes that hit the twin towers, quite possibly. but hey, tell it to the devil--I'm just his (her?) advocate!
Kevin Barrett Pimping "Treason"
Nothing says "kook" like an overwrought and overstated complaint made to your government!