No-Planers' Latest Nutty Claim--"No Plane Hit Building 7"

No-Planers' Latest Nutty Claim--

"No Plane Hit Building 7"

Controlled Demolition fanatics damage movement with claims that fly in the face of public misconceptions

(New York City) - Just when many of us thought we had put the specter of the "no planes" disinfo campaign behind us, it appears that the proponents of this clearly absurd line of inquiry have added yet another claim--and this may well be their most bizarre, and damaging, yet.

As 9/11 truth legends like John Albanasal (filmmaker, Everybody's Gotta LIHOP Sometime) continue to line up behind the NYC CAN (VOTE 4 LIHOP) initiative, disinformation artists from the "controlled demolition" wing of the truth movement have apparently decided to derail our progress with fresh new claims that WTC7, the third building to collapse as a result of planes being hijacked by al Qaeda terorrists was not hit by any plane, and that it was intentionally demolished with preplanted explosives.

"Those of us who have been working closely with victims families and first responders to convince them of Bush's role in directing Pakistani intelligence to fund the U.S. trained jihadists in their deadly mission really resent this no-plane crap" says activist Jan Gold.  "As a tireless advocate for the whole truth about Pakistani and Saudi complicity in 9/11 the last thing I need is to have to explain to the families that I have nothing to do with crackpot 'no-plane' theories or holocaust denial."

Gold's concerns are proven valid on the streets of New York, where common folk like Jimmy Blunt react angrily to the claims made by the no-planers.  "I was HERE.  I SAW the planes hit the buildings, and it makes me sick that there are people who WEREN'T here who say building 7 wasn't hit" says Blunt, who applied to the Vicitm's Compensation Fund for reimbursement for his dead extended family who he says lived in an apartment in building 7.  "Did they not see it collapse?  Did Towers 1 and 2 not collapse after being hit by planes?  What's the f***ing mystery here? What, do they also deny the holocaust happened?" he adds, brushing tears away from his eyes and onto the dashboard of his Rolls Royce.

"It would be one thing if the no planers were limited to fringe sites like wtcdemolition.com," opines Arabesque, an expert on disinformation in the truth movement "but alas, we have clowns like David Ray Griffin who just won't stop publishing books that include claims of no-planery at the Pentagon, Shanksville, and building 7.  This is really hurting our chances to connect with people on issues that they care about, like protecting them from the Bush administration's friends in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, and stopping anti-semitism."

Asked if 911blogger.com would continue to give free rein to those insisting on repeating the no-plane canards, that site's censor Reprehensor answered "It's a legitimate concern.  Early on, people weren't quite sure what to make of the various no-plane theories, but now it's increasingly clear that all the claims of no-planes at the Pentagon and WTC7 are being made by COINTELPRO agents to deliberately harm the movement and promote unhelpful and speculative angles like controlled demolition and holocaust denial.  If it keeps up, we'll definitely need to ban certain people from posting anymore."