Leaked NIST Docs: "Unusual" Event Before Collapse Of WTC 7
Leaked NIST Docs: "Unusual" Event Before Collapse Of WTC 7
Unexplained "jet of flames" shot out of window before implosion of skyscraper
Paul Joseph Watson & Aaron Dykes
Prison Planet
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Leaked confidential NIST documents concerning the investigation
into the collapse of WTC 7, the 47-storey skyscraper that was not hit
by a plane but imploded in under seven seconds on 9/11, reveal that an
"unusual" event preceded the collapse of the building - a "jet
of flames" that shot out of several windows after most of the fire
had already died down.
The documents - entitled Confidential and Predecisonal
Document NIST Report on Building 7 - form the preamble for a long-awaited
final verdict on what caused a structurally reinforced building to fall
like a controlled demolition despite suffering relatively minimal fire
damage.
(jump for more)
Chapter
1: WTC 7 Visual Evidence, Damage Estimates, and Timeline Analysis (William
Pitts) is a thorough analysis of window fires by video and picture
evidence, which concludes that all major fires before floors 7 and 13
died out prior to collapse.
The report states, "At 4:38 p.m. all of the windows
between 13-44A and 13-47C were open, and the fires responsible for opening
the windows had died down to the point where they could no longer be observed."
"Just prior to the collapse of the building
at 5:20:52 p.m. a jet of flames was pushed from windows in the same area.
The event that caused this unusual behavior has not been identified."
The report describes the nature of fires from floors
7-13 and also states, "With the exception of the fires on the 19th,
22nd, 29th, and 30th floors discussed at the start of this section, there
is essentially no direct visual evidence of fires on other floors of WTC
7."
The photographs displayed in the report, many of which
have never been seen before, do not show any other damage to the building
than the small fires from floors 7-13 and the relatively minimal "scoop"
observed on the lower right-hand west face of the building.
What could have caused this "jet of flames"
to shoot out of windows immediately prior to the collapse of the building?
The decompression force of a series of explosives or an incendiary device?
The leaked documents precede a BBC
hit piece documentary which airs on July 6th and is set to claim that
WTC 7 was the first steel-framed building in history to suffer a complete
collapse from fire damage alone - a scientific impossibility.
As
we reported on Monday, Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department,
New York City Housing Authority Barry Jennings, who was trapped inside
Building 7, reported explosions going off and witnessing dead bodies before
the collapse of either of the twin towers.
We will be combing through the lengthy NIST documents
over the course of the next few days to pick out more irregularities and
potential smoking guns over the next few days - stay tuned. Feel free
to e mail us with any interesting
discoveries of your own.
Click
here for copy files of NIST documents.
FYI - large file sizes:
McGrattan Chapter WT..> 24-Jun-2008 21:27 1.8M
NIST_NCSTAR_1_5G.doc 24-Jun-2008 21:40 86.2M
Prasad Chapter WTC 7..> 24-Jun-2008 21:52 10.7M
WTC 7 chapter Pitts.doc 24-Jun-2008 21:57 42.7M
- dicktater's blog
- Login to post comments
leaked? sounds fishy...
Especially since the source is Alex Jones...
And there are plenty of legitimate reasons...
...to suspect that this "leak" is a part of a dis/misinformation campaign. Still a good enough reason to study the content, no?
of course, don't mind my grain of salt...
we have to be ready for anything. whenever I see "new revelations" from AJ though I remember things like the "Chavez to call for international commission on 9/11" and similar overblown stories. so who leaked this? or perhaps more realistically to whom was it leaked? what was the timing of the "unusual event"? two seconds before the collapse? 10 minutes? My guess is that if this is disinfo it is somehow laying the ground for some bogus attribution of the collapse to the fuel tanks in the building... thanks ofr posting it, we'll have to keep an eagle eye on this!
Agreed!
I can't answer your reasonable questions regarding the leak. And, I have too many interuptions to pay close attention to AJ's interviews with Kevin Ryan and Richard Gage, who are on right now. I wish that you were willing and able to call in and express your concerns. You know, you go to the front of the caller queu if you disagree with AJ. <:-P
D e b u n k e d !
Many people have seen or heard of the evidence showing that Petros
Evdokas passed through the World Trade Center ground floor and
basements of the Twin Towers on several occasions in the Spring and
Summer of 2001. All his trips there involved using some of the
underground subway stations and connections, and occasionally walking
up those tremendously long staircases.
WTC Building 7 is only a fart's glide away from where the subway
station exited. Several passers-by had reported that "funny smells"
were trailing behind him as he walked up the stairs to the outside; in
fact, some even complained of hearing "pop-pop-pop sounds".
Why would the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
investigators be feigning ignorance of these facts? The whereabouts of
Petros Evdokas, a well known Middle Eastern-style fart perpertrator
were established early in the investigations, even before the events of
September 11 took place.
On his journey to the US that Spring, he and his partner were
interrogated at length at the airport in London by Security working for
the US State Department. The operation was "outsourced" by the US to
British personnel hired by the United Kingdom who apparently were known
to both Governments for doing a better Security job than their American
counterparts because they actually understood the value of employing
polite manners and listening skills - something that American Security
personnel are incapable of grasping. (Though they really have been
trying at Abhu Graib and in Guantanamo.)
Regardless of polite manners and good listening skills, the two
travellers were interrogated at length and pressed to divulge the
details of their fifteen year long relationship; where they met; how
exactly they treated various illnesses in their healthcare practice;
what their activities in the Green movement were; in the anti-apartheid
movement; whether they had visited other countries in the Middle East;
etc. Going to absurd lengths, the "interview" finally got to some of
the most ridiculous parts:
After having been through three consecutive Security inspections of all
his posessions (x-ray, searches by hand where everything was opened)
and then a body search, at the end of this lengthy interrogation Petros
Evdokas had to answer the question "Are you carrying any weapons?"
A medium length discussion ensued as to the definition of "what exactly
is a weapon". Both the interrogating officer and his victim came to the
agreement that "anything, in the right hands" can be used as a weapon.
Petros was then asked if he had anything that HE could use as a weapon.
To which he responded by pointing out that he didn't have his
acupuncture needles (they were in the suitcase, stored with the luggage
on the airplane) but that in his backpack there were pens, pencils, a
roll of toilet paper, notebook, two books, a paper clip ..."and", he
said, "I can always disarm the opponent with a fart."
They all laughed, the Security agent closed his notebook where he had
written down everything, apologized for delaying and almost preventing
the two travellers from catching the plane, and they were
"allowed to America".
At the World Trade Center a few weeks later, delightful intimations of
the "disarming fart" came up often during the few times that Petros
Evdokas traversed the Concourse and went up the long escalators,
dispersing his discreet charm and lots of that particular gas that was
recorded as a weapon "in the right hands" by Security at the airport in
London.
So, why would the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) investigators be feigning ignorance of these facts?
The "jet of flames" reported in the leaked NIST document is a natural
phenomenon whose origin is clear as day. WTC 7 is only a fart's glide
away from the Concourse. A lot of Middle Eastern-style fart gas was
accumulated in that building after Petros Evdokas had "passed" that way.
Then, on September 11, as soon as Larry Silverstein agreed to the
demolition plan and said those infamous words, "pull it" (he was not
refering to a finger, but to the building), the electricity running
through the wires to set off the demolition charges ignited all the
trapped farts. Exploding just before the demolition charges, the farts
made a historic contribution to the day's events appearing momentarily
through the windows as a "jet of flames" and then adding themselves to
the destructive forces that brought down the building.
What's the mystery in all that?
I don't get it.
Petros Evdokas
petros@cyprus-org.net
http://petros-evdokas.cyprus-org.net/Another-sort-of-Introduction.html
___________
LOL
Way to get into the spirit of the blog, Pet! The question now is were they BLUE flames. I can very much appreciate the fart as weapon issue living as I do in the skunk capital of the USA...
"pet"???
will it be a full church service or a quickie at the county registrar?
[expletive deleted]
*gag*
cher agacesouris
"pet" is a homophone for the french word for fart. now i realize you probably think a homophone is something having to do with being gay, so you may want to avail yourself of an english dictionary as well as a french one. this site is for intelligent, cultured, and worldly truthers, you see. you on the other hand are a bit of a thickie methinks. but hey, you make us look good, so please keep posting! otherwise we might just have to make a sock puppet of you...
PS touché has an accent aigue on the e
nyuck, nyuck, nyuck
I've always been concerned that we protect the ozone layer because above that is the fartzone. If the ozone layer goes, all those farts come down. And, they won't go back to where they came from either.
I believe that this little experiment lends credence to Petros' story.
the Petros Dollar
backed by the full faith and credit of Petros'digestive system!
OMG! Where others wear lapel
OMG! Where others wear lapel pins of the American flag, Petros will be wearing this "Petros Dollar" as a badge of honor!
Will he soon be seeking sanctuary...
in the Church of Controlled Demolition?
http://911blogger.com/node/16319#comment-190574
Who leaked them?
Is there any indication where these documents came from? I don't have word, so I can only open them in "Text Edit..." I can see the .png files, but they don't have any indicators either... Can someone convert these to .pdf files?
Submitted by Jon Gold on Wed, 06/25/2008 - 9:19pm.
John's must be a real Mac Daddy. Text Edit???
Hey John. Try OpenOffice. It's free.
http://www.openoffice.org
Staying on topic...
...with the potty humor.
San Francisco may name sewage treatment plant after Bush
http://www.iht.com/bin/printfriendly.php?id=13984448
By Jesse McKinley
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
SAN FRANCISCO: Reagan has his highways. Lincoln has his memorial. Washington has the capital, and a state, too. But President George W. Bush may soon be the sole president to have a memorial named after him that you can contribute to from the bathroom.
From the Department of Damned-With-Faint-Praise, a group going by the regal-sounding name of the Presidential Memorial Commission of San Francisco is planning to ask voters here to change the name of a prize-winning water-treatment plant on the shoreline to the George W. Bush Sewage Plant.
The plan - hatched, naturally, in a bar - would place a vote on the November ballot to provide "an appropriate honor for a truly unique president."
Supporters say that they have plenty of signatures to qualify the initiative and that the renaming would fit in a long and proud American tradition of poking political figures in the eye.
"Most politicians tend to be narcissistic and egomaniacs," said Brian McConnell, an organizer who regularly suits up as Uncle Sam to solicit signatures. "So it is important for satirists to help define their history rather than letting them define their own history."
Not surprisingly, those Republicans in a city that voted 83 percent Democratic in 2004 are not thrilled with the idea. Howard Epstein, chairman of the ever-outnumbered San Francisco Republican Party, called the initiative "an abuse of process."
"You got a bunch of guys drunk who came up with an idea," Epstein said, "and want to put on the ballot as a big joke without regard to the city's governance or cost."
The renaming would take effect on Jan. 20, when a new president is sworn in. And regardless of the measure's outcome, supporters plan to commemorate the inaugural with a "synchronized flush" of hundreds of thousands of toilets that would send a flood of water toward the plant, now named the Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant.
"It's a way of doing something physical that's mentally freeing," said Stacey Reineccius, 45, a supporter of the plan. "It's a weird thing, but it's true."