Let's list the things that are wrong with this... First of all, we have Cynthia McKinney who apparently gets all of her info about 9/11 from John Judge, who doesn't believe the towers were demolished. Then we have Luke Rudkowski, friend of tax evading gun nuts and a fan of David Icke. Rounding out the cartoon trio is Richard Gage, now sporting a new "bald look" that makes him look like Lex Luthor. Prominently featured in the bullet points is Steven "Glenn Beck's credibility is skyrocketing" Jones' probably fake nano-thermite evidence. To top it all off, Victoria "Victronix" Ashley approves! Well, except for the inclusion of April Gallop who like most truthers still claims to doubt that AA77 slammed into the Pentagon (what does she know, she was only there!) The sad thing is that there are probably a fair number of honest people caught up in this event, who are being duped by the fake truth juggernaut... So sad...

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Victronix's comment:

The posters are great and it looks like a great event. Cynthia McKinney is an extremely inspiring speaker. However . . . I think its unfortunate that someone who claims that a plane could not have made the hole in the Pentagon will be involved in this. That claim is contradicted by dozens of eyewitnesses who saw the plane approach and crash (likely hundreds if not thousands saw the plane approaching and / or hitting but were never interviewed). Although many people support April Gallop as a survivor, and we all understand it was a horrible tragedy to have to live through, it is unfortunate that she has been a central source for the misguided claim that a Boeing jetliner could not have hit the Pentagon.

Here is a statement on the Pentagon issue by Richard Gage:

I strongly recommend that people who care to research what happened at the Pentagon take personal responsibility for forming their own conclusions by acquainting themselves with a wide range of analysis done by people who have come before them rather than jumping to conclusions based on a skewed selection of evidence and argument, or being unduly influenced by any type of authority figure. Use your own discernment, based on your use of the scientific method to arrive at a coherent theory that you can confidently stand behind.

One of the authors cited above, Frank Legge, PhD., admonishes us to adopt a “prudent approach” to the Pentagon piece of the 9/11 puzzle. In the end he wisely advocates the “precautionary principle” which is to “assert only what we can truly know,” given the contradictory evidence, misinformation, disinformation, and lack of information from official sources, and the difficulty in verifying much of it, years after the fact and with inadequate resources. Legge concludes that there is prima facie evidence that “the official explanation of the event at the Pentagon is false and that a cover-up exists. He concludes as well this negative hypothesis: that there is “no proof that a 757 did not hit the Pentagon.” And, since officials are holding the cards (videos) as to what did or didn’t hit the Pentagon, Dr. Legge’s recommendation is that investigators “take care to avoid publicly asserting that the 757 did not hit the Pentagon”.

We can all agree that no hijacked plane should have been able to violate the airspace of our nation’s capital and hit the headquarters of the most sophisticated defense system in the world – an hour and a half after the assault began on the Twin Towers. The 9/11 Truth movement will be more likely to succeed in its effort to educate the public about the Pentagon by focusing on those areas of greatest agreement.

Sincerely,

Richard Gage, AIA

Recommended Reading: 9/11 Pentagon Witnesses: They Saw the Plane Hit the Pentagon, Video by Jeff Hill, June 14, 2010 The Pentagon: A joint statement by David Chandler and Jonathan Cole, David Chandler and Jon Cole, Dec 2010 A dozen questions about Flight 77 and the Pentagon that might lead to justice, and one that won’t, by Kevin Ryan, Oct 2010 Flight AA77 on 9/11: New FDR Analysis Supports the Official Flight Path Leading to Impact with the Pentagon, Frank Legge, (B.Sc.(Hons.), Ph.D.) and Warren Stutt, (B.Sc.(Hons.) Comp. Sci.) Jan 2011 What hit the Pentagon? Misinformation and its Effect on the Credibility of 9/11 Truth, Frank Legge, (B.Sc.(Hons.), Ph.D.), July 2009 (updated Feb 2010) “Debating” What Hit the Pentagon by Exaggeration, Name-calling, and Threats, Gregg Roberts, Jan 2011

Submitted by Victronix on Wed, 04/20/2011 - 7:55pm.