I don't see how anyone can criticize the voting system on 911blogger !

Indeed, when you conducted that poll about controlled demolition, it was one of the times when truth and majority concensus just so happened to align.

However, as we know from history, truth and majority consensus do not always coincide. (Galileo, anyone?)

How DARE a "truth site" have a system which seems to imply that truth = majority vote!

And if a comment receives 10 up votes and 10 down votes, it simply says "0 votes," as if no one had voted at all.  This is beyond ridiculous.

I made these points about 8 or so months ago when LeftWright started a thread welcoming user feedback on how to make the site better, and ironically, my comments got highly voted up.  Many people agreed with me: "Show total ups and total downs."  We also mostly agreed that to hide a comment at -3 or below is just stupid.

Pretty deafening response from everyone except LeftWright.  Guess 911blogger's solution was to appease us?  They changed the "below viewing threshold" from -3 to -5!!!  ZOMG

Wow, Justin Keogh, that was a stroke of brilliance!  You became my fave truther overnight for that!