
thanks Jpass
I agree 100%. Still, the way I look at it, it's significant that having not explicitly endorsed CD as a group in the past they have decided for whatever reason that it is now prudent to do so. You are right to question the specific language--it may clue us into what agenda, if any, they may in fact be promoting. I find the word "loophole" in particular to stand out, sore thumb-like. Lapses in security protocol, sure--but "loopholes"? Sounds like they're driving at something specific--what might that be? We might look at their statement in the context of Kevin Ryan's recent series on "access" which seems to have been written as either a trial balloon or a laying of the groundwork for Limited Hangout 1.0™ ...

WTCD User Comments
10 years 19 weeks ago
10 years 32 weeks ago
10 years 48 weeks ago
11 years 20 weeks ago
11 years 20 weeks ago
11 years 22 weeks ago
11 years 29 weeks ago
11 years 29 weeks ago
11 years 29 weeks ago
11 years 29 weeks ago