In one of Jones' comments at Blather, he said that Hoffman's "Hypothetical Demolition Theory" was "reasonable" and he thanked him for putting it together, "so I wouldn't have to".

Reasonable?

Hoffman's (now modified) theory is that 30 illegal immigrants, who are untrained in explosives and can't speak English, were used to run around at amazing speeds to plant 1.8 million ceiling tile bombs, in 56 hours. And they were not aware that they were bombs, by the way...

His theory is that even though Jones himself says that they can't even be sure if the material he found was a high explosive or a low explosive (meaning it would either create a shock wave or not)he is postulating that this stuff would not create enough of a shock wave to pulverize one floor above it, but also the one below, meaning that they only had to put it every other floor. That's a mighty powerful high explosive.

He is also suggesting that they disguised the kicker charges (again, more high explosive) as "fire extinguishers" an left them on the walls of an occupied office building.... (imagine the gig would have been up had there been a small fire in someones waste paper basket or in the break room) so that if there was a fire, someone would have pulled an active bomb off the wall and run towards the fire?

Oh yeah, I forgot... there was no demolition of the core columns under the area the plane hit, so I guess he is suggesting that the massive core just fell apart as the building came down?

And this is "reasonable" to Jones?

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2009/04/04/serious-problems-with-jim-hof...

"The future is not inherited, it is achieved." JFK