...about the nanothermite paper also. This is, to my knowledge, the first time I've aired these suspicions publicly.

The vast majority of us in the movement do not have scientific expertise. We simply knew that it would be a victory for our side if a paper, supporting CD, were to pass "peer review in a scientific journal."

Now, it could be that the paper's content is 100% accurate. Honestly folks, I haven't even READ the paper from start to finish. Because I know that much if not most of it will be over my head. This, even though I have promoted the link as a way of saying "nah, nah, nah, nah, nah" and rubbing it in to people on various forums, who in 2005-2008 would say, "Why don't you troofers get your act together and get a submit a scientific paper to a journal for peer review?"

However, being the non-scientist that I am, how am I to know that further down the pike, there won't be ANOTHER scientific paper, published in another (or even the same) journal, which (at the very least claims to) blow the Harritt paper right out of the water?

Forget about the fear some people have about the govt releasing a high quality color video of AA77 hitting the light poles and Pentagon as a way of neutralizing the movement; what if the nanothermite paper is the REAL honeypot?

This suspicion is furthered by the fact that three of the authors, Gregg Roberts, Frank Legge and Kevin Ryan, have all within this past year jumped the shark.

This is why I've been so fond of promoting the North of Citgo evidence for the past year+ now. No scientific expertise needed to understand the implications. One need only be a mentally competent adult, such as one would need to have to serve on a jury.