Was Saudi Arabia responsible for security and cleanup at the WTC?

is not an honest member of the truth movement. This article by Kevn Ryan, which is nothing but a mis-direction away from Israel/Zionism towards those "real bad Arabs", is all the proof we need that Kevin Ryan is part of the controlled opposition, possibly serving as one of Cass Sunsteins's cognitive infiltrators.

Let's do some quick math on Ryan's article. I did a search on the following terms to see how many occurrences of each appeared in his piece of LIHOP CRAP:

Something's very wrong with this picture.

Anybody doing honest, objective research into the security of the WTC and who had demolition access should have discussed the fact that the key entities controlling security were Zionist owned/controlled, see Kevin Ryan Writes Another Limited Hangout Piece Regarding WTC Security, Limits Scrutiny to Bush/Bin Laden and Profile of a Pre-planted expert: Jerome Hauer.

Oh, and you might think that since Kevin Ryan at least mentioned "Kroll" - a Zionist owned and controlled security company who was given major responsibility to manage security of the WTC - that he at least attempted to be objective, right? Well, you would be mistaken. In fact, you are probably going to have a really hard time believing what I'm going to say: Not only did Kevin fail to mention the role that Kroll played in having key control over security at the WTC, he actually attempted to link Kroll to Saudi Arabian interests, instead of the obvious Zionist/Israeli links!. Now, that is a level of ludicrous nonsense that would seem to be pretty hard to imagine for someone to attempt to pull off and still expect to maintain some credibility. How does he attempt to twist reality into a knot like this? Check it out:

The companies that designed and built the security systems for the WTC complex had strong connections to Saudi Arabia too. For example, Kroll Associates board member Raymond Mabus was the US Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, and all four of the WTC security implementation companies had completed major projects in Saudi Arabia.

Yes. That is the only mention of Kroll in the entire article. So, there you have it. In Kevin's LIHOP world of absurdity and bizarre logic, the mere fact that a board member was the US Ambassador to Saudi Arabia 6 years prior to 9/11...that means that Kroll is linked to Saudi Interests? But let's not even talk about Kroll Director Jerome Hauer and his role as a national security advisor and various other functions for the Bush Administration and the Giuliani Administration, nor all of his ties to Israel and other key Zionists involved with the WTC security and Mossad, etc. Nor should we mention Kroll's Zionist owners Jeremy and Jules Kroll and their interesting connections. Nope. Not at all. Nothing to see here, folks! Instead, let's meander down another wild goose chase and argue that because Kroll, like so many other similar companies, had contracts to do work in other countries, including Saudi Arabia, that that means that Kroll is linked to or controlled by Saudi interests, right Kevin? And you really think that is a logical and objective way to research and analyze what interests really controlled and influenced WTC security?

Is Kevin an Islamophobe or anti-Arab bigot that makes him blind to anything that does not point to evil Arabs everywhere? Or is there some other reason why Kevin must turn reality on it's head in such a way? Here is the rest of the so called "evidence" he attempts to use for his conclusion that all roads lead to Saudi Arabia:

[...]
Former FBI director Louis Freeh, whose agency investigated al Qaeda-attributed terrorism from 1993 to 2001, is now the personal attorney for Saudi ambassador "Bandar Bush." 115 The Saudi government has been sued by thousands of 9/11 victim's family members due to the suspicion that Saudi Arabia helped to finance al Qaeda. 116 The Saudis hired the law firm of Bush Administration insider James Baker to defend them in that lawsuit.

How pathetic. That's the kind of crap you are attempting to use as "evidence" that all roads lead to Saudi Arabia? Sorry, Kevin, I'm not buying your LIHOP bridge to nowhere and I think you should resign from the truth movement for attempting to foist such shameful disinformation and anti-Arab propaganda onto the truth movement. Your attempt to protect Israel and Zionism for its role in 9/11 while participating in the dishonest framing of Arabs/Muslims that has served as a crucial pretext for genocidal was that have killed millions of innocents, is a disgrace to all who work for truth and justice in the world. Same on you!

incredibly, he manages to do it without mentioning any links with Israel, Mossad, Zionists, of course.

In his second of 4 parts: Demolition Access To The WTC Towers: Part Two - Security

He talks quite a bit about Kroll. But again, he manages to miss (or is it pretend not to see) the huge elephant in the room - the one common denominator among all key owners and controllers of Kroll - while only finding connections to Saudi Arabia and the Bushes, no matter how weak and tenuous.

There's even a section called Kroll leaders and history. Aha! now we're getting somewhere, right? Wrong. Incredibly, he manages to completely ignore that huge elephant again.

He even mentions the Port Authority of NY, NJ, and also seems to find every other connection that does not involve that elephant again. PANYNJ Chairman Eisenberg is even mentioned. But again, a strange omission of the thing that connects Eisenberg and all the other key people at Kroll and Silverstein Properties controlling security at the WTC.

Even Larry Silverstein is mentioned, and yet again, a strange omission of that elephant.

For his conclusion in examining the security relationships at the WTC, he manages to find the following commonalities:

Several facts are clear from this review of the companies and people responsible for revamping the security systems for the WTC buildings, and securing New York City, on 9/11. One is that many of the people involved were deceptive and/or corrupt, and appeared to have benefited from the attacks. Another is that many of them were connected to each other and to the investigations into previous acts of terrorism and the terrorist financing bank BCCI. Yet another striking similarity among these organizations is that they all did major work for the Saudi Arabian government, or the royal family of Kuwait.

Wow, Kevin. Are these really the only entities that benefited from 9/11 that you are aware of? Nothing about one of the biggest beneficiaries of all - Israel? And, you were able to find a "striking similarity" in how a lot of these entities "did major work for the Saudi Arabian government", but you don't find it striking that the key ownere/controllers of the security companies and agencies were all linked to Israel, Zionists, and Mossad? Really Kevin? You don't find that interesting at all? You don't find it interesting that the key entities controlling the security at the WTC, the airports, and key agencies in the Bush Administration, neocons with dual Israeli citizenship, were all connected to Israel, Mossad, Zionism? I find it interesting and striking that you apparently don't find any of this interesting and striking...I call it willful ignorance.

Pray tell, Kevin, how does the fact that a company "did major work for" Saudi Arabia in any way implicate Saudi Arabia in having demolition access to the WTC towers? How is that "relationship" in any way comparable with the level of control or influence of those who actually own and control that company, Kevin? I think you need to go back to school and learn basic logic, because your logic is absurd, to say the least.

We've got 3000 threads now on this blog? Holy crap