The ‘Jersey Girls’ Support AE911Truth
About time, ladies!
The ‘Jersey Girls’ Support AE911Truth
Posted on 26 February 2010 |
The ‘Jersey Girls’ Support AE911Truth
Original article available on AE911Truth.org
From AE911Truth: We’re proud to have the endorsement of The Jersey Girls, who single handedly forced the Bush Administration to convene to 9/11 Commission after one year of inaction following the attacks of September 11.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is proud to be working for and on behalf of the 9/11 victims’ family members, in particular The Jersey Girls. We recommend “9/11 Press for Truth“, which is the story of the Jersey Girls and their struggle for the truth.
We are pleased that Patty and Lorie have signed our petition. We have also received signatures from Josef Princiotta, Manny Badillo, Bob McIlvaine, Ellen Mariani. Let us know if there are any of them we are not listing here!
We have taken a lot of criticism from so called debunkers & unconscious government officials that our work is “upsetting the family members”. Let it be clear that only the truth about the deaths of these innocent people will bring healing to their loved ones. AE911Truth has ever increasing support from them to reveal the truth to the American people.
Open Letter from The Jersey Girls
February 25, 2010
We must applaud Mr. Richard Gage and his colleagues, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, for their tenacity in seeking to answer lingering questions concerning the total destruction of the World Trade Center complex, in particular buildings 1, 2 and 7.
As with any scientific report, conclusions must be able to be replicated and verified by subsequent public peer reviews. Mr. Gage and his colleagues have attempted to do just that with NIST’s Final Report of the Collapse of the WTC. There seem to be discrepancies and omissions in NIST’s conclusions, which Mr. Gage and his colleagues have brought to light.
With their combined professional training and work experience, this group of professionals is uniquely qualified to address the myriad oddities resulting in the collapse of the WTC high-rise buildings – including WTC 7, which was not hit by an airplane. This chosen course of action by the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, has often come at a high cost to them personally and professionally making this endeavor all the more admirable.
As family members of 9/11 victims, we have been seeking truth and transparency since 200l. Almost nine years later, in spite of the NIST Investigation and the 9/11 Independent Commission, a vast majority of our questions remain unanswered.
It was always our hope that both of these government investigations would uncover the cause of the WTC destruction and any loopholes or lapses in security protocols that could be remedied to protect us in the future. In this case, it was of utmost importance to determine what actually caused the collapses to ensure the future safety of high-rise buildings. Since the government failed to do that, we applaud Mr. Richard Gage and the many other professionals who are spending their own time attempting to seek the truth.
Sincerely,
Patty Casazza
Lorie Van Auken
Mindy Kleinberg
Monica Gabrielle
NOOOOOOOOO!!!
I... I... NOOOOOOOO!!!!
-------------------------------------
Do these pants make my ass look big? Would you tell me if they did?
(No subject)
You... you... you don't know what to say?
cut him some slack, Adam...
...this probably just means his talking points were held up in the mail. surely someone will soon clue him in as to how he is to incorporate this development into his shtick...
big development, narrow shtick
Lookie here! Gold
Lookie here!
Gold supports AE911truth now too! Listen to the interview, toward the end I believe. Bursill asks him specifically if he supports Gage's organization.
Despite Jon Gold having quit
Despite Jon Gold having quit 911blogger, it seems that blog can't stop pimping this disinfo agent. I find the post at
http://www.911blogger.com/node/22742 to be totally annoying. It seems the writer is aware of what Jon Gold is doing yet goes ahead and promotes him anyway. Naivete or a shared mission to spread disinfo?
When will they get it that all this prevarication by Gold about CD has not been an innocent difference in approach to truth advocacy but rather an attempt to undermine the strongest evidence that could lead to the culprits of 9-11.
yea it is about time
I'm glad to see this...but I'm suspicious as usual. Isn't THIS just a little obvious?
Loop holes? Security protocols to protect us? Safety of high-rise buildings?
Secretly planting explosives in 3 HUGE skyscrapers and demolishing them on 9/11/2001 goes beyond a 'high-rise safety issue'.
I'm not sure what the Jersey Girls mean by 'loopholes or lapses in security protocol' but it sounds more vague bs to me.
thanks Jpass
I agree 100%. Still, the way I look at it, it's significant that having not explicitly endorsed CD as a group in the past they have decided for whatever reason that it is now prudent to do so. You are right to question the specific language--it may clue us into what agenda, if any, they may in fact be promoting. I find the word "loophole" in particular to stand out, sore thumb-like. Lapses in security protocol, sure--but "loopholes"? Sounds like they're driving at something specific--what might that be? We might look at their statement in the context of Kevin Ryan's recent series on "access" which seems to have been written as either a trial balloon or a laying of the groundwork for Limited Hangout 1.0™ ...
The jersey agents
And: " we applaud Mr. Richard Gage and the many other professionals who are spending their own time attempting to seek the truth."
ATTEMPTNG TO SEEK the truth???
In others words : we, the Jersey Girl who search for the truth full time since 2001 and still are clueless about why the 3 towers seem to have...err...sort of...err.. collapsed, think Mr. Richard Gage and the many other professionals didn't find any truth yet.
Therefore the towers weren't necessarily proffessionaly demolished as Mr Gage claims to have demonstrated.
Someone should ask them why
Someone should ask them why it took so long for them to endorse cd, or even if they do in fact endorse cd. Just like Jon Gold, I think they purport to support Gage and AE911truth only because they risk losing credibility by denying cd.
They don't.
Their "open letter" makes clear that they don't endorse CD at all.
Already they try to blame the collapses on faulty construction: "loopholes and lapses in (building) safety protocols".LOL!
They pretend to support AE911truth in order to impede, corrupt and disrupt it, I'm sure. Just like they did with the truth movement as a whole for the last 9 years. I hope Richard won't fall for it and that he takes appropriate mesures.