Jim Hoffman, in no uncertain terms, in numerous articles and public comments, has accused the Citizen's Investigation Team of being a Hoax and conducting Fraudulent research and completely dismissing the idea that they could be genuine researchers. These smears and accusations have not stopped despite the fact that most of the 9/11 Truth Heavyweights have endorsed the research of the Citizen's Investigation Team and their latest video, National Security Alert.

By implication, Jim Hoffman is accusing all these prominent researchers/activists of either intentionally pushing/supporting disinformation, or of being incapable of recognizing "obvious" disinformation:

1. Richard Gage
2. Peter Dale Scott
3. Edward Asner
4. David Ray Griffin
5. Kevin Barrett
6. Sander Hicks
7. Aidan Monaghan
8. Lt. Colonel Shelton F. Lankford
9. Sheila Casey
and others who have recently given their endorsement

Hoffman really must have contempt for the Mainstream 9/11 Truth Movement for him to alienate all these people. What does that say about Hoffman's intentions regarding whether he is trying to help or hurt the movement, and if other researchers who are supposedly collegues of his can trust him or rely on him not to stab them in the back or sabatoge their efforts?

It looks to me like Hoffman is pretty much divorcing himself from the mainstream 9/11 truth movement and/or doesn't care about how severely he is attempting to divide and alienate all these people, most of whom used to respect him.