that there are a group of so-called "researchers" and "activists" who have infiltrated the movement whose main purpose is to keep people away from "What Happened at the Pentagon" and have consistently and un-apologetically utilized any and all manipulative means in their bag of disinformation tricks to try to keep people from examining the evidence at the Pentagon - "Nothing to see here, move along folks, DON'T YOU DARE QUESTION THE OCT OF THE PENTAGON ATTACK OR WE WILL SMEAR YOU AND USE ALL MEANS NECESSARY TO TRY TO LIBEL YOU AND MARGINALIZE YOU."

Obviously there are certain people who are DEATHLY AFRAID OF PEOPLE EXAMINING THE PENTAGON ATTACK EVIDENCE. What are they so afraid of? I'd say that is a rhetorical question for those who are capable of being reasonable and have their eyes open.

Since about fall of 2005 is when I started noticing this pattern, and that is in fact what made me look closer at the Pentagon attack. You see, when I was a newbie truther in June of 2005, I pretty quickly came upon Jim Hoffman's articles on the Pentagon, on how he was trying to "protect the movement" from disinfo and that the theory that AA77 didn't crash at the Pentagon was a "hoax". I actually believed Jim Hoffman for a minute. But, pretty quickly I had realized that I was being manipulated with dishonest and false arguments and that pissed me off. I then noticed that all sorts of web sites, like oilempire.us and others were utilizing the same false debunker-style arguments and the pattern became clear to me.

Well, when people try to manipulate me into not looking at something, I'm the type of person who will want to look closer at that thing that I'm being pressured not to look at. That's just the way I am. Since about fall of 2005, I began to use the Pentagon issue as a litmus test to weed out the fake truthers from the real ones.

The fact that the Pentagon Attack has been subject to more obfuscation, disinformation, lilly gilding stories, and obvious cover-up activity by what I can only assume are the perpetrators of 9/11, that tells me that THERE IS DEFINATELY SOMETHING TO SEE HERE AT THE PENTAGON, and that is why I will not be persuaded or guided or manipulated or pressured to NOT focus on the Pentagon. And, the more we shed light on the evidence at the Pentagon, as well as on the individuals who are trying hardest to dissuade us from looking at the Pentagon Attack, I feel like the movement is actually making more progress in figuring out what actually happened on 9/11, as well as figuring out who the genuine vs the fake researchers/activists are.

I also say that when anyone in a "truth" movement is caught blatantly lying and distorting the truth, they should be called out immediately and relentlessly and shamed. A list of lies and distortions should be documented and distributed to as many people in the movement as possible to make them aware until those individuals are shamed out of the movement.

Let me make one thing clear. Jim Hoffman, Mark Robinowitz, "Arabesque", Victoria, and all the other disinformation agents of that ilk started this attack on the truth movement several years ago and began the war to divide the us. it is the height of disingenuousness for them to then call for civility and accuse their critics of being "divisive". Fine. They want to use the Pentagon Attack as a divisive wedge against people? Well, I'm going to take that wedge and turn it into a sledge hammer back at them. They may have started this divisive war, but they may not like how it will turn out. They made their divisive dishonest bed, now they will have to lie in it, and they can expect no mercy.