Scrubby's picture

oilempire.us

holy wow, those arguments over there against the obvious demolitions are really quite amazing.

Griffin: " WTC 7 and the towers came down at virtually free-fall speed, meaning that the lower floors, with all their steel and concrete, provided no resistance to the upper floors; to believe this could happen without explosives is to believe in magic."

oilempire.us: "Or that a half million tons of building falling up to a quarter mile would have tremendous ability to shatter the lower floors. It's not "no resistance," merely just insufficient to stop a falling skyscraper.
This type of rhetoric ("magic") is propaganda, not science."

Griffin: " Pools of molten metal were found under each building. Because steel does not begin to melt until it reaches about 1,540°C and yet the fires could not have gotten over 1000°C, to accept the fire theory is to believe in magic."

oilempire: "Aluminum melts at a much lower temperature (what are planes made from???). 1000 degrees C is enough to weaken steel supports (they don't need to "melt" to lose structural strength). This is also a contradiction - if the fires were hot enough to melt metal (steel or aluminum?) then demolition is not needed as an explanation for the collapses."

Reply