they know that some of the truth is going to come out without question. It simply has to. Now, instead ofletting it be the part that incriminates THEM, they make sure it's the part that incriminates someone else. Why pick Bush? Well, think of Bush as a less talented JFK. JFK ended up paying for his father's crimes. Old Joe was a bootlegger, a booze smuggler in other words, and one of his rivals was Meyer Lansky, whose Jewish mob network had been running the gambling biz in... Cuba! There was animosity there but also a degree of a thieves' code of honor. So by helping Joe's son become pres by helping to rig the vote in Chicago, the Lansky types were hoping to have a friend in JFK, who would let their businesses thrive and also help them get rid of Castro who had kicked them out of Cuba. Instead JFK puts Bobby in charge of going after their erstwhile allies--big doublecross in gangsterland, and proves to be inept in getting Castro out. To top it all off he is dead set against Israel acquiring nukes (remember--Lansky and Jack Ruby were involved in running guns to Israel in the early days of the Irgun terrorists-I mean freedom fighters).

Now, Prescott helped the Nazis who were in fact enacting the "Final Solution" that benefited Zionists as much as if not more than anyone else, since it involved Germany, conscious or not of it, providing the service of a) scaring the hell out of Jewish people and b) getting them out of Europe and into Palestine. George HW Bush was part of the Texas oil scene, LBJ was from Texas, JFK was killed in Texas, and Israel is in the oil rich middle east. Start to see the connections lining up? Now Dubya may or may not know anything about real history, but some might say HE'S in danger of being the next JFK. The Bush cronies who played along in order to get to where they are are now a liability, or at least a convenient scapegoat and Dubya, god bless him, got himself right in the middle of it.

So when you think about it, it's the Zionists who have everything to gain from pinning 9/11 on Bush AND preventing people from learning about their long-running involvement in some of the darkest chapters of AMerican and world history. Did the international bankers hijack an otherwise benign ideological movement? Or were they behind it from the beginning? Does it matter?