The original post is here, but it is CONSCIOUSNESS (one of the good cookies still left at 911B) who nails it in comments. Nothing terribly new here (as the poster of the blog seems to think his/her "theory" is) but I love the comment by C because it includes many important details. I'm not really sure about the bill folding points--it IS suspicious how closely the folded images match but even if this was deliberate I bet it was only meant to lend an "occultish" and freemasony aura to the whole thing. Anyway, here is C's comment in all its MIHOP w/faked hijackings glory:

Good to see critical thinking...
But I think you've got it wrong. You need to keep doing more research, you don't have all the details yet.

Don't try to figure out how THEY pulled this off. Try to figure out what YOU would have to do if you wanted to pull this off.

First of all, you must realize that these builidngs were "White Elephants". They were badly in need of restoration, asbestos removal, and upgrades. This would have reportedly cost around one billion dollars. Obviously not worth the investment just to spruce up a couple old sky-scrapers. So if they are money-pits, and they cost too much to be repaired, they obviously have to come down. Ok, so what are our options to bring the beasts down?

Option 1. Disassemble from the top down, floor by floor. Sorry, not gonna happen. Too expensive again, costs in the billions.

Option 2. Controlled Demoliton. But how do you do an implosion on a 110 story pencil, with a nearly indestructible central core? Obviously if you blow from the bottom up like a normal implosion, there is almost no way to control where the giant topples. Plus, this building can't fall "into itself". The tall, narrow dimensions plus the mammoth cores won't allow it. So you have to EXPLODE it, from the top down. But even this will wreak havoc on the surrounding neighborhood. There's really no way to bring a building like this down cleanly and safely, plus, New Yorkers are going to have a fit if you try to take away their sky-line. So what to do?

Well, maybe you just happen to have a friend in the government who is looking for a way to start a war and blame it on Muslims...

A-HA!! So these towers have to come down, and the most cost effective way is controlled demo. This is going to cause tons of damage, but the way of minimal chaos would be to explode and pulverize them before they hit the ground. So if we're looking to do this in a clandestine way, AND instigate a war with Muslims at the same time, how do we pull it off? Airplane hijacking, of course!!! Everyone knows Muslims are terrorists and they like to steal planes. Fly a plane into the building and make it look like the plane knocked the building down!!

You see, the demolition WASN'T designed around the plane impact. The plane impact was brought in as a soluiton for how to mask the demolition. It was simply misdirection, plus a way to blame Muslims.

Now, a couple other problems with your analysis...

"It seems logical that, being unable to predict the exact location of the projected impacts..."

But they WOULD be able to predict the exact location of the projected impacts if the planes were GPS guided. And when we think about the high stakes of this operation, and how ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL it would be for the planes to hit their targets, we can see that there is CLEARLY NO WAY this mission would be left up to Arab hijacker patsies. The planes absolutely had to hit the buildings, and the only way to guarantee this would be through GPS/autopilot guidance.

Also, there is a bit more evidence that the planes were precision guided to hit those exact spots. Now, this doesn't say much on its own and may seem silly at first, but when taken in context with all the other pieces of evidence it becomes a bit more significant. The redesigned Federal Reserve notes that came out in '99 and 2000. No it isn't an urban legend. If you fold the bills a certain way, they REALLY DO show the Trade Center disaster. And no, it isn't a coincidence. If just one bill showed something that looked like the Twin Towers, THAT could be called a coincidence. It's not just on one bill. It's on FIVE! And it's in sequence!! If you still think this is a coincidence, I suggest you get a mathematician to work out the statistical probability of EIGHT images of the disaster appearing on FIVE bills (Five of those images in sequential order). Start with a five dollar bill, and go up to a one hundred dollar bill. If they are folded correctly, they show the entire sequence of destruciton in ascending order starting on the 5 dollar bill. AND on the backs of three of the folded bills, is the Pentagon hit. This is no coincidence. And yes, these bills were designed and released BEFORE 9/11. Now, the reason this matters (some) is because on the 20 dollar bill, we can see the Twin Towers smoking from the exact same locations where the actual hits occurred. Since the bills were designed and released before the disaster, the location of the impacts must have been pre-determined. (And obviously there are logistical reasons for predetermining the impact sites.) Now, I don't want to give the impression that I'm basing my conclusions on this bill folding trick. Rather, this small detail just adds a bit more support to the idea of government complicity, and helps show that the details of the attack were planned in advance.

Check out the bill trick here: http://www.glennbeck.com/news/05172002.shtml

Now the last thing I have to say, is that there is a problem with this assumption:

"The largely intact top sections would have disintegrated when they hit the bottom and..."

Careful analysis of the collapse proves that the top floors actually disintegrated BEFORE "crushing" or "pile driving" the floors below them. In other words, the top 15-20 floors were blown from the bottom up, more like a classic controlled demo. Only instead of imploding into themselves from the bottom up, they exploded outward from the bottom up. Then, once the roof-line had collapsed down into the dust cloud, and the resulting "shroud" had enveloped several floors below the plane impact site, the top-down explosion sequence began for the rest of the building.

Here is a photographic analysis that proves this assertion: http://www.911blogger.com/node/9154

The thing that had me stumped for a while was how could they have wired the upper floors of the building and not had their wires cut off by the plane impacts... DUH!! Wireless!!!! Remote detonators. Problem solved.