Evidence Suggesting Fake Truthers May Have Been Involved in Concocting Pretense for Blaming Muslims for Norway 7/22 Attacks

gretavo's picture

First, take a look at the following post to Jeffrey Hill's Facebook group, the so-called "9/11 Justice and Accountability Research Think Tank":

 

Thomas "Hawk" Hellstrom is the self-published author of an ostensibly non-fiction book called "Hawk of Pandora: A 9/11 Missing Link" in which he claims to describe his experiences as some kind of law enforcement agent in Atlanta.  It is a convoluted story written in stilted English about his contacts at Atlanta nightclubs with individuals he describes as Chechen mujahideen warriors.  According to Hellstrom these individuals form part of a network of Islamic extremists operating globally, including in Norway, under the influence and on behalf of Cheney and the Neocons.  It is, in other words, the purest LIHOP slop, and Hellstrom is assiduous in invoking all the usual suspects--Colleen Rowley, Sibel Edmonds, evidence from the Moussaoui trial of far-flung contacts between Jihadi stooges, etc.  Mind, this was all written recently but well before the attacks in Norway.  Had initial media claims of involvement by Islamic radicals in the attacks stuck, or if they should resurface, Hellstrom's narrative would dovetail nicely as the "9/11 (fake) Truth" version in which yes, the perpetrators were Muslim extremists but the "truth" is that they were operating on behalf of the usual gang of LIHOP perps.

The connection to Norway is highlighted in the follwoing excerpts:

Members of political youth organizations in Norway have been
known to naively and openly raise financial support for organizations
officially listed as terrorist groups such as PFLP, Hamas and Hezbollah.

Socialist Youth of Norway’s Socialist Party had sponsored a summer
camp to collect funds to support the Popular Front for Liberation of
Palestine (PFLP) which is listed as a terrorist group under U.S. and EU
watch lists.[2] PFLP has had a long history of active terrorist
activities ranging from numerous airplane hijackings, airline bombings
and suicide bombings. Most victims were normal civilians.

Officially during the war in Lebanon 2006, one of Norway's
socialist parties had made a clear policy not to support Hezbollah as
long as they targeted civilians, but endorsed support for military
targets.

...

One crystal clear and universal fact about political organizations
whether from far left or far right is that most if not all has some form
of corrupt connection to armed militant groups (often designated as
terrorists) that they exploit for political purposes behind the curtain
to further their ‘legitimate goals’ against oppositions. Norwegian
political organizations are no exception."

http://www.hawkofpandora.com/shadownetwork.php

...

"After seeing her out of control ways and
behavior, there were simply too many ‘red light’ warnings flaring and
far too many coincidences overlapping each other. This convinced me
enough to write up a memo concerning Hachim’s son Jamal as a possible
suicide bomber candidate due to the events, patterns and social network
around this woman, the group, the clique, and the group’s close friend’s
ties to Noukhaev, Saidov and Surikov’s Chechen network and his
rendezvous in the Caucasus town, Russia when Anton Surikov was present.
Especially Hachim’s son’s poems described with a lot of passion about
committing suicide for a cause. His poems and his fascination with Dante
Alighieri came at a time when the Muhammed cartoons were published by
Jyllands Posten in Denmark that triggered many other newspapers to
publish the cartoons and then was republished by Magazinet in Norway co
owned by the Zionist Christian extremist Ulf Ekman and Living Word. The
uproar against Norway despite the fact that many newspapers around the
world had already published the Muhammed cartoons, Magazinet became an
extra added insult because it was republished from a magazine controlled
by rightwing Christian Zionists Ulf Ekman and pro Israeli Living Word
evangelist movement. This was regarded as a deliberate provocation with
the blessings of the mainstream public.

The issue with Jamal’s poems was left lurking in the back of my head
for most of the year. Several other issues began popping up that
eventually lead me to write up the first draft of the report. Before I
did, I went through painstaking research and a lot of thought to figure
out how I was going to handle this. I had to consider all the pro’s and
con’s in dealing with this. After all, this was about Jamal and his
family’s life, reputation and his future to consider versus many other
lives including his if he would have been targeted as a recruit.

Again the elderly woman’s abrupt involvement with a Pashtun
businessman whose former bar catered to Arfan Bhatti’s gang, Bhatti’s
ties to Pakistan, KLA and network and strong indications of one of her
friends in touch through his Baltic friend with Anton Surikov, Ruslan
Saidov and Khoz Noukhaev’s network, who also had tight connections to
KLA, I realized there were too many things happening that surmounted to
an increasing threat assessment.

By October, 2006, I had sent in a report about a possible suicide
bomber candidate through an officer in the Norwegian Military due to the
concurring conditions and political turmoil of various concerns.
Norwegian rightwing Christian ‘Magazinet’ republished the Muhammed
cartoons that caused more uproar with Muslims. Cheney and the neocons
were trying to gather allies for an eventual conflict in Iran and Israel
invaded Lebanon in what was called “Operation Clean Break” based on
Perle and Feith’s policies to Likud. Norway was one of the main players
in the cease fire negotiations which again interfered with the
neoconservatives agendas. All were political primers for pending
terrorist acts. At first, I didn’t have all the puzzles put together but
knew enough that my instincts were flaring like rockets’ red glare.
Jamal as a candidate seemed to fit right in with emotional, demographic,
idealistic, political and sociological motives.

The report was specifically laid out not to accuse the kid of being a
terrorist but as a proactive intervention to avoid any potential
opportunities for this kid to be recruited. I needed to ‘burn’ this kid
to prevent any possibility of recruitment. Also without placing this kid
in harm’s way, defaming his personality and to ensure his possibilities
for a future were not tainted if I was wrong. This kid is very bright
and talented and I refused to disrespect that. But I also had to take
into account the overwhelming indications that could have placed his and
others lives at risk. His expressions in his poems and his father and
uncle’s relationship to the member of the suspected group in Trollville
and their continued relationship and continued contact with other shady
friends who were apparently in contact with extremist networks would
serve as catalysts to recruit Jamal as a suicide bomber. All it takes is
unwitting communication to the wrong people and place this model
candidate on their radar to exploit. Ruslan Saidov was that exact person
to take advantage of recruiting this kid.

Note: The suicide bomber candidate and his father had no direct or
indirect ties to any terrorist group other than the group that were
setting them up as terrorists. This group (opportunists) is initially
suspected of helping to recruit this kid through thier Baltic contact to
Surikov and to a university in England in 2007 which was directly
connected to Anton Surikov's organization IPROG. All in all it was clear
that the suicide bomber candidate, his father, his uncle and a few
others were being set up as escape goats by this group who were involved
with contacting and gathering connections that made a Norwegian
homegrown terrorist cell seem apparent and imminent."

http://hawkofpandora.com/preview2.php

The Trollville group and clique and environments
I describe above as a whole and any involvement with these criminal
networks are easily condusive to exploitation for politically corrupt
goals by government or corporate elite entities and those who play part
in these shady environments allow for the probability of being exploited
and leaving an open opportunity for the development of violent groups
or 'terrorist groups' under falseflag terms.


As described in the "Abrams Agenda", "How convenient would it be to have
a 'terrorist cell' combined with North Africans linked to Iran/Syrian
backed Polisario Front with access to the Nobel Peace Prize concert - A
lebanese family (vaguely) linked to Iranian backed goups in Southern
Lebanon (note: most southern Lebanese have some form of contact with
Hezbollah, PFLP-GC or other groups but doesnt make them a terrorist with
the exception of Bush doctrine where everyones a terrorist) and a
Pakistani tied to a Norwegian born Pakistani 'terrorist' (already
indicted for targeting a Jewish synagogue and terrorist plans against
the U.S and Israeli Embassy) with ties to a KLA connected crime boss and
add a group of Chechen dissidents and former Mujahideen (present in the
town where the explosives were uncovered) - also tied to KLA - Al
Qaida?"

"Would a terrorist act against a former U.S Vice President and Nobel
Peace Prize Concert be enough to trigger war against Iran given Cheney's
trigger happy itchy finger moments in 2007 to strike Iran?"

The deceitful, reckless and criminally negligent acts of the
Trollville clique and group endangered not only these individuals that
were being set up but many others and even at worst case scenario could
have triggered war! First World War was started with one shot, the Iraq
war was started with fabricated lies and these other wars continue due
to direct corruption!
Think before you act!!!

Note: The suicide bomber candidate and his father had no direct or
indirect ties to any terrorist group other than the group that were
setting them up as terrorists. This group (opportunists) is initially
suspected of helping to recruit this kid through thier Baltic contact to
Surikov and to a university in England in 2007 which was directly
connected to Anton Surikov's organization IPROG. All in all it was clear
that the suicide bomber candidate, his father, his uncle and a few
others were being set up as escape goats by this group who were involved
with contacting and gathering connections that made a Norwegian
homegrown terrorist cell seem apparent and imminent.

http://www.hawkofpandora.com/shadownetwork.php

What Hellstrom is describing here is a conspiracy between the CIA, American neocons (perhaps using Israel as an attack dog), and right wing Christians in Norway to provoke Muslims in Norway into being radicalized so as to unwittingly carry out attacks that would force the socialist-leaning Norwegian people to stop trying to broker peace in the Middle East thereby thwarting the neocons' ambitions.  However convoluted the story, it probably would seem extremely plausible to people unaware of the nature of the fake 9/11 truth movement.

Its intent is apparently to support the following false beliefs:

1) Israel a pawn of the United States and of the neocons, not a mastermind of any kind

2) Muslims are easy to "radicalize" because of their "legitimate grievances" and so we should not be surprised when they attack

3) Right wing Christian Zionists are more prone to collaborate with the neocons than are Jewish Zionists, and they do so not out of love for Israel or Jews but because their theology tells them the "in-gathering" must happen for the Messiah to return (on which they agree with the more militant orthodox, conservative, and nationalist Jews-except that their Messiah is of course Jesus, who will kill any Jews who don't accept him.)

And to hide the following more likely facts:

1) The United States and the neocons are the pawns of Israel and their wealthy loyalists around the world.

2) Actual attacks on innocent unarmed civilians by Muslims are exceedingly rare--far more rare than similar attacks by non-Muslims, especially when one considers how many attacks ascribed to Muslims are actually carried out byZionist operatives.

3) Christian Zionism as an ideology is not strongly enough held by its adherents to justify participation in violent acts--mostly just vocal support for hard-line Zionist policies and as such can hardly be considered a driving force in the fake War on Terror.  Christian Zionists however make great fall guys because they are easily equated with neo-Nazis who would not be suspected of collaboration with Zionists (however much history has borne out just such collaborations.)