Ron Paul

i think that people predisposed to voting for third party candidates(Paul ran as the libertarian candidate in the past and admitted running as a Republican to get into the debates etc.) like Ron Paul are generally more likely to come to their own conclusions about something like 9/11. in other words, people who dont settle for the lesser of 2 evils and instead actually make a somewhat informed choice on who to vote for(based on facts that the media obviously doesnt provide) are more likely to also seek out information on 9/11 on their own. yes, many online Paul backers are motivated by people like Alex Jones, but Jones' reach isnt that far, not 5 million in one day far. whether you like Paul or not, you have to admit that most people that support him are generally better informed than people who support a McCain or an Obama etc. i dont think its a ruse or concerted effort or anything, just like most Nader voters had a better grasp of reality than mainstream voters so do most Paul voters this time around, which means more of them are better informed about 9/11. if there was a TRUE 9/11 truth candidate out there, i think you would have seen most of that Ron Paul support within the 9/11 movement slip away. McKinney has been better than Paul on the 9/11 issue, and better than most politicians, but of course thats not saying much at all. she also wasnt in any debates and gets zero coverage and raises no money. Paul at least had some coverage/money. there is no 9/11 truth candidate, so Paul and others get support from some.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5940854.html