. . . and thanks gretavo for keeping it, despite your dislike and distrust of the topic. i thought i was alone among "real truthers" (yes, i have voted myself into this exclusive club;-) in thinking that some of the 9/11 video looked fake. not saying it IS fake, but looks fake.

however, my focus was always on this video of flight 175, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stdfd6hLGWA&feature=related which i believe is the same video used in "9/11 mysteries" and "loose change," which is where i first came across it. when wathcing those films, i frankly could not believe that the film makers were not commenting on what i was seeing, i.e., that the video looked so obviously fake.

however fascinating this topic might be to some (myself included), i would say that at this stage, there is little point in pursing this intensely, IF the goal is to get mainstreamers to see that the official 9/11 story is a coverup and bring about a real investigation. but...if there were ever such an investigation with a hefty budget, and i had a vote, it would be to go after the filmers and broadcasters and tv produers involved with the allegedly fake videos, because (a) i'd like to know if the videos are fake; (b) and if they are fake, who faked them--how, when, and for what purpose; and (c) this avenue of pursuit could quite possibly get us closer to the inner circle. also...

i too like the "super-duper-mind-fuck interpretation" casseia's "local colleague" gives it in the last paragraph.

and "I [too] am always uneasy when an idea is beaten into submission by the rabble."

being a relative newcomer to 9/11 truth myself (sept 2008 awakening), i did not know that "controlled demolition itself was subject to very harsh opposition from 'respectable' truthers." hard to believe, as CD looks so obvious.