The evidence seems to be incontrovertible that all three of the WTC Towers had pre-controlled-demolition explosives that were set off in apparently random fashion on the morning of 9/11. The perpetrators seem to have had a plan or purpose for doing this, as it does not seem plausible that they were set off by accident. That begs the question: Why? On the surface, it would seem that setting off some of the explosives prematurely was risky because it would make it more obvious that explosives were pre-planted. But perhaps they were set off to divert attention from the bigger event - the high-tech controlled demolitions. Since so much of what went on that day seems to have been done for the purpose of creating diversions, such as the planes and fake hijackings being used to divert attention from the more important events (which killed more people) that would seem to require an "inside job" aspect to pull off, these "diversionary" pre-CD explosions would seem to fit into the same theme.

There are multiple witnesses who describe explosives going off in the lower levels of the Buildings 1, 2, and 7. Many of these people describe the elevators exploding and extensive damage to the lobbies and basements. This would seem to indicate that the explosions that occurred prior to the controlled demolition sequences were from explosives planted inside the buildings, rather than outside or from truck bombs. The fact that all 3 controlled demolitions of the 3 towers subsequently went off successfully in perfect sequence, that would seem to indicate that the pre-CD explosions did not go off by accident. The perps apparently set them off on purpose. My current working theory is that the perps set them off in a seemingly uncontrolled fashion in order to make it appear more plausible that low-tech "Islamic terrorists" planted bombs that, along with the official fire-induced collapse theory, led to the total destruction of the buildings, if at some point in the future people were to question why the buildings totally collapsed in what looked like controlled demolitions.

This way, fakes like Jon Gold could then go run around and claim that bombs may have been planted by the designated Muslim Boogeymen, while rejecting the notion of a high-tech controlled demolition. This would explain why Jon is strangely good friends with Willy Rodriguez - you know, the guy who goes around talking about explosions in the tower he was in? (see William Rodriguez Supports Official Collapse Theory on Spanish TV) It's strange because Jon has never shown any love for any cd advocates ever...oh wait a minute...that's right: Willy Rodriguez is not a cd advocate. He naver speaks about cd in his presentations, only bombs while he apparently supports the official collapse theory. He also supports the official hijacker theory, and even participates in gilding the lily by claiming that he saw one of the hijackers casing the building before 9/11, and asking about bathrooms...uh huh. So, that's my take on what's going on.

What say you truthers?