" Next, if you succeed in getting a few of the “super-thermite matches,” I propose to send you the complete paper that we have — which includes a discussion of these matches along with their potential usage on 9/11. I think that super-thermite “matches” of this type could very well have been used to trigger more conventional explosives such as C4 in the WTC buildings.

… A real demonstration would involve a C4 shaped charge applied to a steel column, with the cutter charge ignited by a highly-reliable super-thermite match (in turn triggered using a remote radio signal).

These experiments would test my hypothesis.

… About C4, we have not yet looked for residues and indeed these will be difficult to find UNLESS there was a taggant, which is unlikely (if my hypothesis of out-sourced production of C4 and probably super-thermite matches is correct…)" J0nes from email he published on 9/11 Blogger…

Jones has consistantly morphed his original "thermite" story, over and over again.. thermite, thermAte, superthermite, nanothermite, and now "electric matches"...

He always lets the theory last as long as it can stand up to the other researchers, then morphs it a bit thanks to new "discoveries" in his research.

He has single handedly stunted the chemical phase of the unofficial investigation of 911 since late 2005...

and the whole time he was getting paychecks from BYU, an institution by the way with a school in Jerusalem.

I am surprised that after all this time you still prefer to think controlled demolition of that skill level could have been accomplished with explosive paint on the walls...

but as you said... to each his own. Just don't forget to take all the rest of Jones' behavior into account as well as the fact that he is now working very closely with a guy who helped kick off Jim Hoffman's and Victoria Ashley's career.

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2009/09/01/so-now-professor-jones-agrees...

"The future is not inherited, it is achieved." JFK