Home » Dawn Vignola's Account vs. Erik Larson's Methods by CIT

Allende Admirer's picture

More Conclusive evidence

Submitted by Allende Admirer on Wed, 2010-02-03 16:14.

I had to laugh at this :
Our intrepid reporter 'Rancho Truth' publishes his second ground breaking scoop.... "Shinki and Ed Paik’s accounts vs CIT"
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6312&sid=ddcd9f4a0cf1fe246d...

In his Conclusions, Chief Inspector Clouseau says:
"CIT have caused disruption and division in the 9/11 Truth Movement, and have distracted some activists from larger questions and {more conclusive evidence of wrong doing}Hyperlink to http://www.historycommons.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

The history commons front page that we are referred to as a reference for "more conclusive evidence of wrong doing" mentions:

Al Qaeda 20 times
Terrorism 15 times
Bin Laden 10 times

Collapse 0 times
WTC7 0 times
Silverstein 0 times
Architect 0 times
Demolition 0 times
Thermate 0 times
Explosive 1 time .... "terrorists crashing an EXPLOSIVE-laden blimp into the Superbowl stadium,"

»

Reply