After all, at WTCD especially, isn't there the suspicion that the perps and gullible MSM might eventually acknowledge 'secondary devices' at the WTC (i.e. when ae911truth reaches 10,000 or 100,000 architects and engineers) but try to blame it on the Evil Muslims? Remember, William Rodriguez has even said he saw one of the "hijackers" in the building months before the attacks and has said he felt sure that the guy was "casing" the towers.

Bombs in the Pentagon, though: THAT can not be spun onto the Evil Muslims. Forget about "flyover," the real incriminating evidence they're gatekeeping against is BOMBS IN THE PENTAGON. For me personally, the north flight path has been proven to my satisfaction. Though I do understand what you mean about eyewitnesses and the power of suggestion, suggestive influence, and how it's possible for lots of eyewitness accounts to be false. I don't think that the 14 could essentially all be wrong in the same way though. Granted no two witness drawings of the flight path are exactly the same, but imagine: You and thirteen others are staring straight ahead. You all see a plane fly over and past yourselves to your left. Now, when questioned later, one person might point to his ten o'clock position when asked to point up to where the plane was. Another person might point to the 11:00 position. Maybe another points to 9:30. But none of them point to the 2:00 position. Do you see what I mean?

Thanks for the support. My friend from Cincinnati 9/11 truth also submitted a comment in support of me that never got posted.