I applaud your tenacity to continue evidential arguments long after many others like myself would either have given up or degraded into ban able / censored comments. I wrote a comment(Censored there copied here somewhere) in support of you when you were attacked for your socks etc, as the situation in regard to this site, irrelevant attacks , and apparent bias by site focus inevitably leads to such deviousness (Asymmetrical Blogging).

I also believe that the CIT line is an important discussion/ valid research, and that the way it was excluded and framed at 911B was wrong.

However, although you might have been the final straw, I dont think you should portray events at 911B as a victory for you or CIT's evidence.

If it is true as LW suggested , that the most divisive issue is what happened at the Pentagon( I would have thought lihop/Terrorist myths) then I have to say that I think it is undesirable, as I do not consider that 'line' to be anywhere near as conclusive or damaging to the OT than WTC Demolition. If, as I have argued elsewhere , volume alone (advertising) = promotion of the 'best evidence' (in the absence of any other selection or promotion), then the comparative importance of the Pentacon has been massively overstated. On this point alone I would have to agree with the muppets.

14 or even 50 eye witnesses can be subject to memory flaws/ suggestive influence /mis interpretation, misrepresentation
or even bribes. Arguments on both sides of 'CIT' acknowledge this, so whilst useful,and a valid indicator,I cant support the claim that in the current incarnation this evidence 'proves' the OT/hijacking myth wrong , whereas I believe CD does, and is also an easier and more motivational 'Sell'.