Home » response by Barrett on Elias Davidsson's views on 911 (pulled from end of KB Responds to Steve Alten which Gret posted)

gretavo's picture

i'm going to highlight some salient points...

Submitted by gretavo on Wed, 2010-01-20 16:55.

There are good reasons to suspect that Zionism may have been a key factor in 9/11, reasons that have nothing to do with "hatred" and "prejudice."

[The oil companies] have always supported the anti-Israel "Arabists" in the State Department; they have always tried to deal with "rogue" (anti-Zionist) governments like Qaddafi, Saddam, Iran, etc. but are undercut by the Zionists, as explained by James Petras; they want stability, not instability. Instability is bad for business.

Since it would be in the US national interest to throw Israel to the wolves, as it appears from the pro-Zionist viewpoint, an extremely powerful campaign has been mounted in the US, beginning decades ago, to ensure that Zionists control US Middle East policy.

9/11 cemented the US in a permanent war against Muslims.

Who benefits from a decades-long US war against Muslims? Not the US -- its economy is already staggering under the load.

Israel may or may not be able to survive this US vs. Muslim 100 years war, but without that war, Israel's demise would be guaranteed. Thus Israel (and Zionist hard-liners in the US who ran Cheney's office) had the motivation to take the gigantic risk 9/11 entailed. Some corrupt military money-grubbers and goose-steppers may have gone along with it, but I can't see them as the originators and prime movers.

»

Reply