Home » Welcome to 911blogger.com's LeftWright, and a Civil Discussion on Differences Within the Truth Movement

LeftWright's picture

Ultimately,

Submitted by LeftWright on Wed, 2010-01-27 23:45.

I think we will have to agree to disagree on what constitutes "sound research" and a sound strategic approach to 9/11 activism.

I agree that not all claims are examined with the same level of objectivity and that this is unfortunate. This is something I am addressing and hope to correct over time, as much as possible. With an institution like 911blogger, this takes time.

It is my opinion that the reason for much of the animosity is not really due to the act of critiquing different claims, but is due to the personal nature of many of the arguments made and that too many people interpret critiques on their ideas as personal attacks and respond with personal attacks (from all sides). Because these disagreements have become so personal and heated, everyone, including the moderators, can lose their objectivity to some degree and resort to judgments informed more by bias than rigorous logic. Thus enters the "unreasoned judgment".

That said, it is quite obvious that some people go out of their way to pick fights and focus on wedge issues within the movement to that end. This is something I have very little tolerance for and work to prevent at 911blogger.

»

Reply