
Even this site shows bias,
and where there is bias double standards (to some degree) will follow.
So, yes, the moderators at 911blogger are biased, some more than others, but we are in general agreement on the critical issues.
I am trying to lessen the bias in certain areas and thus reduce the occurrence of "double standards", but there is already an institutional bias that is going to take a while to change.
Bias is not necessarily irrational and can be a direct result of logical analysis. Thus, bias is not always a "bad" thing. I have a bias against junk science and poor or dishonest research, as I expect most true critical thinkers do. As a moderator I also have a bias against rude, disingenuous and immature people; people who bait, badger and bully others, and people who are intentionally divisive and push wedge issues whenever they can.
When one's bias does not align with the bias of a forum, the perception of double standards will inevitably result.
As we revise the rules at 911blogger, we will try to make the policies and procedures of the site more clear. Hopefully, this will also make the focus (or "bias") of the site more transparent and lead to fewer misunderstandings and less conflict.
When in Rome ...

Recent comments
1 day 12 hours ago
2 days 21 hours ago
2 days 21 hours ago
2 days 22 hours ago
1 week 3 days ago
2 weeks 3 hours ago
2 weeks 13 hours ago
2 weeks 4 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 21 hours ago