Home » Welcome to 911blogger.com's LeftWright, and a Civil Discussion on Differences Within the Truth Movement

gretavo's picture

and yet certain people treat the OCT's unproven claims as fact

Submitted by gretavo on Wed, 2010-01-27 12:16.

Jon Gold in particular has said before that he has no doubt that it was AA77 that hit the Pentagon. if that isn't treating unproven claims or theories as fact, what is? Why can't Jon Gold practice what he preaches and admit that he really has no clue what it was that exploded at the Pentagon, and that his HYPOTHESIS is that the OCT is right about some of it?

as far as the fallacy you raise, that anyone who thinks a 757 hit the Pentagon supports the Zelikow narrative, well, yes and no. Given that the physical evidence is wholly inconsistent with ANY 757 hitting the Pentagon, it's pointless to argue whether that hypothetical 757 was AA77 or not. before we accept the extraordinary claim that AA77 was flown into the Pentagon, we should demand extraordinary evdience to back it up. As you yourself admit, that extraordinary evidence, which should exist, has not been forthcoming. Where does that leave us?

»

Reply