Home » Welcome to 911blogger.com's LeftWright, and a Civil Discussion on Differences Within the Truth Movement

LeftWright's picture

Unproven does not mean false

Submitted by LeftWright on Wed, 2010-01-27 11:23.

It just means unproven.

I trust you see the difference, yes?

The major problem with investigating the event(s) at the Pentagon is that the government controls all the definitive evidence and has yet to release anything conclusive (imo).

I don't think serious discussions about the event(s) at the Pentagon should be 'off limits', I just think that honest and objective people should check their egos and dogma at the door and definitely not push hypothesis as theory or theory as fact.

One fallacy I see repeated here frequently is that anyone who thinks that a 757 hit the Pentagon supports the Zelikow narrative (OCT) with regard to the Pentagon. This is a rather mendacious straw man argument. One can believe a 757 hit the Pentagon and believe it was not AA77 or that Hani Hanjour was not piloting (or even on) the plane, all key elements of the Zelikow narrative.

I assume that most of you believe that planes impacted the Twin Towers, does this mean you support the Zelikow narrative with regard to the events in New York?

I think that we're all more intelligent and sophisticated than that, yes?

»

Reply