Home » Welcome to 911blogger.com's LeftWright, and a Civil Discussion on Differences Within the Truth Movement

LeftWright's picture

We don't know,

Submitted by LeftWright on Sat, 2010-01-23 19:31.

and there is still insufficient credible evidence on which to base a theory. Therefore, it is not rational to promote a working hypothesis as a credible theory and anyone who does so damages their own credibility, creates division (intentionally or not) and unnecessarily complicates the ongoing efforts of the truth movement to educate the public, imo.

I think it is also fair to say that the public promotion of said working hypotheses assists those engaged in the ongoing cover up. Please note that I am not saying that this is the intention of those publicly promoting said working hypotheses, only one side effect of said public promotion.

I agree that it should be much easier to prove that a 757 impacted the Pentagon than proving that one did not. It should also be a relatively easy matter to prove that AA77 was that plane. But we do not control the critical and definitive evidence and will only have access to said evidence once we can force a real investigation. This is where our focus as activists should be, imo. Researchers are always free to pursue their own line of inquiry, of course.

I have no interest in discussing or analyzing CIT's work right now, as I have far too much on my plate at the moment.

Please note that I work with, and am personal friends with, people on both sides of this issue, we just simply agree to disagree and move on.

I trust that this is an adequate answer to your question.

Regards,

John

»

Reply