
So what is your stance?
"The single most divisive issue within the movement stems from all the unfortunate speculation about what happened at the Pentagon. However, I think that most people who have studied the evidence will admit that they don’t have enough credible information regarding the events at the Pentagon to have sufficient certainty about what actually happened"
This issue is pretty easy to deal with if you ask me. The divisiveness I see comes from those who want to assume things that aren't proven and then demand proof that their claims DIDN'T Happen.
If someone claims that a 757 hit the Pentagon, they need to prove it. I agree with your assertion that 'we just don't know'. So that means the most acceptable stance is to NOT ASSUME a 757 hit the Pentagon.
My position is only supplemented by CiT's work along with the shady video that the Pentagon released.

Recent comments
1 day 12 hours ago
2 days 21 hours ago
2 days 21 hours ago
2 days 22 hours ago
1 week 3 days ago
2 weeks 3 hours ago
2 weeks 13 hours ago
2 weeks 4 days ago
2 weeks 6 days ago
3 weeks 21 hours ago