Home » Welcome to 911blogger.com's LeftWright, and a Civil Discussion on Differences Within the Truth Movement

Allende Admirer's picture

Unite behind what ?

Submitted by Allende Admirer on Wed, 2010-01-20 10:43.

We need to know exactly what it is that we are uniting for/with. If the proposal of unity could be expressed in an article or statement, then we could discuss it.

At the moment, the proposal on the table I am aware of is the comments that Jon Gold made in his Cheri Roberts interview http://www.911blogger.com/node/22370
and suggestions that people put aside their evidential preferences to unite behind a list of "irrefutable facts" which I mainly refute and I believe to be diversionary and unrepresentative of the majority of the movement's main concerns.

Is the proposal that we unite behind a statement that we do not know what happened and we need a new inquiry to tell us?

Or is the proposal to unite behind Ae911truth, or some other leadership who the majority can have faith in and defer to, to represent our concerns.

Is the proposal to stop (Sometimes bad tempered)evidential discussions on 911 related evidence?.I would suggest that such discussions are valuable, but should be accompanied by polls and promotion of the best evidence (democratically decided) or else an impression is given of a movement in disarray with no consensus.

Since the forum for 911 truth is predominantly on the internet, what particular address can be trusted to host
inclusive democratic discussion, and will dissent be censored by some arbitrary panel (leading to division)?

»

Reply