I'd like to go further with this.

I'm open minded about this discussion but still extremely skeptical of www.911Blogger.com. Secretly moderating user contributions and secretly banning users is extremely suspicious and even negligent to the truth about 9/11/2001. Selectively applying these rules (ala Jon Gold) doesn't make things less creepy.

First, a user is 'selectively moderated' which means his/her comments must be 'approved by 911Blogger Mods'. Comments can take hours or days before joining the discussion which, unless you live in a vortex, is hours or days along in it's maturity. Now that just pisses me the 'F)(* off and it just might show in my moderated comments. Has anyone else forgone the discussion taking place and just sent messages to the mods in charge of approving your comments?

I could even support this sort of behavior if it was public. But the community really has no idea that someone was wiped out of the discussion. They have no idea how often dialog is restricted and exactly for what reasons.

I would love to have my 911Blogger account re-instated. Maybe I'll use it..maybe not (; probably though. But mainly it's for the record.

Lastly, I haven't forgotten how rotten and fake I believe 911Blogger.com has become. Is it possible that 911blogger.com has helped build up certain myths regarding the 9/11 attacks?

This cross-website discussion helps. And I understand 'human irrationality' and 'we are all human with day jobs and kids'...but let's not forget the extremely violent and diabolical nature of the topic we have taken on.

Someone wired those buildings for demolition.