Home » Jon Gold Accused of Being COINTELPRO On 911Blogger for Denying CD: Gold's Days Numbered?

Keenan's picture

Jon Gold Accused of Being COINTELPRO On 911Blogger for Denying CD: Gold's Days Numbered?

Submitted by Keenan on Fri, 2009-11-13 12:01.

It looks like the days when Jon Gold could get away with openly denying CD on both 911Blogger and TruthAction are rapidly coming to a close as more and more brave Real Truthers are willing to fall on their swards (get banned) by calling him out for what he really is - a "moron" or "COINTELPRO". The tables definately appear to be turning against the most notorious Fake Truther in all of 911Blogger history.

From the 9/11 Controlled Demolition Movement cutting edge: Announcing the truth to the officialdom. The politicians thread.

» login to post comments | 0 points

Anyone with a 70 IQ or higher should know it was CD.

I find your stubborn refusal to acknowledge the inescapable fact that the towers were blown up in a CD to be highly suspicious Jon. If you have some information that shows my own eyes are lying to me and shows Jones, Harrit, Gage, etc to be wrong about CD then spit it the hell out already dude. I personally don't trust you or your motives AT ALL. I don't think you have one single shred of information that shows the above listed researchers to be wrong about CD yet you persist and persist to try and steer truthers away from what is by far our strongest and most conclusive evidence. I am personally convinced that you are intentionally trying to drive a wedge into the truth movements core. If that is your intent I will say it is a success as far as I am concerned because I am seperating myself from you and any so called truther who denies CD right here and now. I consider you to be the latest version of Judy Wood's DEW crap and Morgan Reynolds hollogram planes garbage. You are full of crap Jon, CD is a fact and I will go to my damn grave before I sit here and listen to a so called truther like you try and steer me away from talking about it and exposing it as a fact at every opportunity. If you Jon as a so called truther do not accept CD as a fact at this point with all the evidence we have compiled proving it then you are either a moron or you are COINTELPRO. In either case I am done reading any of your posts and if I am banned from blogger for calling you out on this then so be it I don't care. It is time blogger put a stop to your canstant attempts to steer people away from our most powerful and conclusive evidence and start treating those attempts like they did attempts to sell DEW theories.

Sincerely,

Adam Ruff part of the 9/11 CONTROLLED DEMOLITION MOVEMENT.

Submitted by AtomicBomb on Fri, 11/13/2009 - 6:20am.

And from True Faction:

http://www.truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=34442#34442
by Pavlovian Dogcatcher
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2009 12:12 am Post subject:
zombie bill hicks wrote:

Fuck off with that petty label shit.

I'm not being petty, just forthright. I hope you might fuck off with the hollow denialism, please.

Rancho Truth wrote:
Pavlovian Dogcatcher- what's the significance/meaning of your user name, 'Pavlovian Dogcatcher'?

It is a reference to my propensity for catching people behaving like Pavlov's drooling dogs.

Jon Gold wrote:
"Controlled Demolition" is a HARD pill for MANY people to swallow...

Sure, because the logical implications of the fact that the buildings were CDed is more than many people are willing to consider. It's akin to telling a kid Santa isn't real. But we've all got to grow up at some point, and we aren't going to get to the truth by pussyfooting around it.

Jon Gold wrote:
You shouldn't have to be a scholar to understand the need for 9/11 Truth.

You don't, but you shouldn't cry bullshit on those who have the scholarship to understand matters you prefer to remain willfully ignorant of either.

zombie bill hicks wrote:

When I ask that the movement stop pushing hypthesis as fact...

I responded by pointing out that you are disparaging fact as hypothesis.

zombie bill hicks wrote:

...I can admit that I've lost faith in the 9/11 truth movement as a political force.

That's bound to happen when taking a position of faith out of an aversion to facts.

zombie bill hicks wrote:

Now I know that not only do I fail the litmus test for being a truther, I'm also complicit in murdering 3000 people.

Why do you embrace the disruptive effects of Jon dragging that melodramatic nonsense into this thread out of his refusal to address what had been said here?

zombie bill hicks wrote:

What a ride its been ..

Like dust in the wind, eh?

»

Reply