I really don't understand how intelligent-sounding bloggers like 'Snowcrash' can intelligently argue against Jon Gold's ridiculous denial of CD, but then go on to push such an asinine and convoluted scenario of 9/11 being, "a conspiracy to co-opt a terrorist attack and enhance it by monitoring and infiltrating the terrorist cell to ensure its success, blowing up buildings and sabotaging air defense."

Does 'Snowcrash' really believe that it is logical and sane for the perps to believe that merely by monitoring and infiltrating a "terrorist cell", they can insure its success on such a complex and massive operation that will result in a transformation of the world for generations to come and accomplish such critically important goals? That they would be 100% sure that the allegedly fanatic islamic terrorists (or were they coke sniffing, strip bar gambling pork eating terrorists?) would successfully hijack the planes and not miss the targets so that the WTC towers would not be sitting there rigged with explosives with no alibi to explain why they exploded and collapsed? Does 'Snowcrash' really think it is logical to assume the the perps would pin all their hopes on such a risky and unlikely scenario?

http://www.911blogger.com/node/21662#comment-219946

So, the two possibilities that 'Snowcrash' proposes for 9/11 is either 1) a conspiracy to cover-up incompetence and sloppiness, or 2) a LIHOP/MIHOP co-opting a terrorist cell?

And, 'Snowcrash' really puts credence into Senator Bob Graham, and all the other official lying sources that push the phony "Al Queda" and islamofascist terrorist backstory in all it various colors and shapes and sizes, with no credible evidence to back up any of that nonsense?

I guess when the 9/11 OCT version 2.0 is rolled out - in which "bombs" in the WTC are conceded but blamed on the "terrorists" - Snowcrash will be right out there in front with Jon Gold in spearheading this crap. When it comes to the most grotesque and absurd core of the 9/11 OP, Snowcrash and Jon Gold are best buddies in pretending to give total credence to anything having to do with all the absurd and unprovable LIHOP slop, whether if from Bob Graham, the 9/11 Commission Report, interrogations of tortured detainees, kangaroo court trials, lying mainstream media reports, Sibel Edmonds, etc. An a-priori assumption of honesty with those sources, even when many of them are mouthpieces of the prime suspects that Snowcrash pins the 9/11 "conspiracy" on, just does not pass the BS detector test and smells really, really bad.

I don't believe that 'Snowcrash' is a complete idiot. Like Jon Gold, 'Snowcrash's' true agenda is becoming all too transparent. To blame such a horrendous, world-changing, hate-generating act on the mythical "islamofascist menace" whose guilt, let alone existence, has not been established with anything resembling a reasonable standard of proof, points to at least 2 possibilities in my mind: 1) Snowcrash is an islamaphobe or has fallen for the engineered and heavily propagandized islamaphobic "terrorist bogeyman" meme, or 2) Snowcrash is helping to shift blame away from some of the actual perpetrators.