gretavo's picture

while I would agree that caution is in order...

I don't find the arguments made by JREF (which is just not a good source, imo) terribly convincing. This is not to say that the "nanothermite" angle may not be some kind of trap, and that AE911truth could be controlled opposition--that would not shock me (surprise perhaps bt not shock) I don't think we gain much by leaning heavily on any current research--for many reasons we KNOW the official story cannot possibly be true. when enough people know this we will be in a much better position to demand and get real investigations into all these issues.

edit: plus, I think that the debris trailing white smoke that Chnadler points out is very different from a regular plume as seen in other parts of the twin tower collapse and in the chinese video. it is not dragging pulverized concrete through the air, it seems to be producing its own white smoke--I'm with Chandler on this one.

Reply