I don't care what that guy said who claimed the wings "folded back into the plane"...

I don't care what NIST's "witness" says (CDI owner, BTW) when he claims the Towers couldn't have come down by controlled demolition...

... and frankly, I don't care anymore what CIT's 13 "witnesses" say anymore either.

Had his response to me been without obvious obfuscation, without obvious malice, without obvious contradictions to HIS OWN WRITING on his own website, I wouldn't call them into question...

but based on what that guy just wrote, I have to wonder about all this.

I have to wonder, is this just another way to keep people from considering a drone or a missile? After all, it IS all about Flight 77 flying toward the Pentagon... that DOES make that blip Flight 77 you know, according to the flyover theory...

And even though you may be able to cast aspersions on each and every one of the witnesses that aren't CIT's (which you can not do)...

you are STILL left with the fact that NO ONE SAW A MASSIVE 757 FLYING AT TREETOP LEVEL OVER A TRAFFIC JAM ON ROUTE 395

And I also know this...

I lived in Virginia. I lived in northern Va. and I worked in Tysons Corner for 4 months on a project. I KNOW what you can and can't see from the roads around the Pentagon because I have been there, I have driven around it MANY TIMES.

Look, I got no problem with these guys, but their story just doesn't add up. Then the guy starts caps-locking all his claims about "NO GLOBAL HAWK" that makes me kind of curious... especially when he ends his little chat BY DEFENDING HOFFMAN suggesting I had no "proof" that Hoffman came along to mislead people from looking at drones as possible weapons used here.

"The future is not inherited, it is achieved." JFK