First of all, I think you guys have done good honest work. Thought I don't fully support your conclusions, I think the campaign to discredit your efforts is uncalled for. I am not a supporter of Hoffman's by the way. Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon, I don't care how much of the FBI's "evidence' Hoffman and his crew post on his site.

That being said... now let's get to your theory.

The biggest problem you have with the flyover theory is the planes' escape. How much sense does it make, from a planning standpoint, to create a huge explosion, get about a 100,000 pairs of eyes turned and looking at the Pentagon, just as a massive passenger jet flies at tree-top level just over the building?

Do you actually think people would be looking at the smoke? Or the massive plane firing it's engines to gain altitude right over the highway?

Doesn't make sense does it? Not to me it doesn't.

Please address that issue when you have a chance. And while you are at it, let me ask you this as well...

I agree that the light pole didn't hit the cab while it was traveling at 40mph. That much is pretty obvious.

But that doesn't mean LLoyd was in on it.

Try this on for size: The cab driver told you off camera that he "wasn't SUPPOSED" to be in on it. It was about "big people"... or something like that. Did you guys ever take that as a clue?

Perhaps the cab driver was just coming along and he saw the light pole there AFTER someone else dragged it out of the bushes. LLoyd wouldn't know that it was a set up. Perhaps he just saw an opportunity to get a new cab through the insurance? So he kicked his own window out, and made up the story.

Did that ever cross your minds? Now I don't read your site so I don't know if you have dealt with that issue before. Also, this is my site, American Everyman...

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/

you can check out a few articles I did that deal with Hoffman and his crew. Got a good one done today actually. Also did a nice dissection of his nanothermite theory...

I just tell you that so you don't jump to conclusions and put me on your enemies list.

To me, what hit the Pentagon was probably a Global Hawk. It could have been painted to look a bit like Flight 77 and the wing span is just as big as a jet liner.

You have your 16 or so witnesses that report the North Approach, they have their 26 that say Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, and there are others who claim it was a "private jet" or a "business class jet"...

And of course, when people started investigating Global Hawks years ago, just also happens to be around the time the Hoffman crew started showing up "correcting" the dialogs in the chat rooms.

So, give me reply before I get relegated to "the list" (what is that by the way?)

"The future is not inherited, it is achieved." JFK