
well, Griffin was retired to begin with
so I don't wonder about him because of funding issues. is his reluctance to delve into the evidence of possible Israeli complicity an issue for me? yes, of course. can I think of several reasons for his stance besides being an agent? yep. to use a different example, (and I know some people will love my saying this) I think it's absurd to believe we landed men on the moon over 40 years ago and are told we simply can't do it again until maybe 2028. To me that is such an obvious problem that I wonder how anyone could not at least have some doubts. Do I assume that anyone who claims to strongly believe the moon landings happened is being dishonest? Of course not--they're just not me, and don't see things exactly how I do.

Recent comments
1 day 13 hours ago
2 days 22 hours ago
2 days 22 hours ago
2 days 23 hours ago
1 week 3 days ago
2 weeks 4 hours ago
2 weeks 14 hours ago
2 weeks 4 days ago
3 weeks 15 min ago
3 weeks 22 hours ago