Personally I don’t think so...

I think the Pakistan connection serves a dual purpose:

Firstly for western audiences to keep Jon Gold & hopefully (for them) the entire truth movement in pork chop transfers for the next decade.

Secondly for Pakistani audiences (predominately anti US) to give the impression that their government whilst on face value a US puppet, is in actual fact duplicitous and has been aiding Al Qaeda all along, propping up their own credibility domestically.

To this end, my prediction is that the Pakistan angle is a mutually beneficial smoke screen that will lead to very little consequence.

My reasoning is that, knowing the towers were demolished, Bin Laden whoever he was and whenever he died was obviously part of the smokescreen, and Pakistan had to be complicit
at every step in keeping up the illusion. (Including of course verifying all the likely faked details of Al Qaeda &,Bin Laden' s recent assassination, and faked mutual distrust and indignation.

I see Pakistan as Kato to the US (as Inspector Clouseau) in the entirely fake war on terror.

I don’t see any advantages in the US forming a premise to attack or invade Pakistan. It would be the mother of all quagmires with very little to gain from it,

Other Quagmires however like Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya were strategically planned, and had exactly the desired outcome, division, destruction, neutralisation, theft of assets, and prolonged conflicts to justify theft from the tax payers to profit the military industrial complex and all it's cronies.

The main target in the medium term is Iran IMO (along with Syria either before or after).

The now openly fascistic oligarchy and Zionists don’t seem to be easing off the gas in their insane agenda one iota.

Also IMO, the biggest threat they face to their success is still the people pulling the plug on them, and IMO the greatest chance of that happening was through 911 truth with its emphatic proof of their tyranny.

To counter that threat, they control the entire western media with an iron fist, using it as their mouthpiece and censor with only the illusion of free press.
They have obviously made an extraordinary effort on infiltrating, undermining, and neutralising the truth movement, With Bin Laden's 'death' played as a trump card.

There is one thing that bugs me though about the recent developments, and Gretavo, Scott/Willy Loman and others I would really appreciate opinion/speculation on this,

Why did they make such a pigs ear of the Bin laden Death story, with faked video(nose),and a completely contradictory mess of conflicting statements about the 'incident'?

was it because:

a) It is a honey trap for 'conspiracy theorists'

b) It was a botched PR Job that went wrong/got out of control through lying.(From the same outfit who brought you the most sophisticated deception and propaganda stunt of all time)

c) Someone stitched up Obama's re election stunt and more fishiness will be forthcoming until the blackshirts replace the brownshirts in 2012.(Maybe someone is annoyed Obama pissed on their Osama fireworks?) I.e. there is actually a difference (& power struggle) between republicrats!?

d) They like to keep it all loose to give conspiracy theorists a field day, just as long as they keep barking up the wrong tree (Pakistan)

e) Something else?