was Hitler worse than someone who would be OK with demolishing buildings on top of rescuers and then blaming it on a specific group of people so as to facilitate butchering them? that's a tough one, especially since having learned what I
've learned about the lies we're taught about ww2 and everything else I'm going to have to study everything all over again to know just how evil Hitler was. What evidence is tehre, for example, of the experiments on humans that you're talking about? I've heard the allegations of course but never thought to check out how strong the evidence is. I certainly no longer believe that it was ever Hitler's intentions to "exterminate" all Jews. Remove them all from Europe? Sure. He was a fascist and when I said "not a nice guy" that was not meant to sugar coat any of his actions.

As a pacifist and a person of conscience I am sickened more by the evil committed daily in my own time than with an evildoer of history, especially when the people commiting the evil today depend on casting Hitler as the only villain in the history of europe. Truman dropping the bombs on Hiroshima--evil? Yet the "anti-fascists" don't compare Bush to Truman, just Hitler. It's Hitler 24/7 for that crowd, and I suspect I know why.

That is not to say Hitler wasn't very bad. But there may well be worse people in the world, either then, now, or in the future. Waiting for someone to replicate a bunch of exaggrated atrocity stories before dropping Hitler as the bellweather of evil is a mistake.