I thought all of us who are fighting for justice, truth, and a return of our country to legitimacy and democracy were anti-fascist. If there is an anti-fascist faction, then what are the other factions of the truth movement? Isn't this "anti-fascist faction" term kind of a divisive statement?

"...of the truth movement is the one that likes to compare Bush to Hitler. My guess is that this keeps people thinking of Hitler as the ultimate evil. While Hitler was not a nice guy, I have come to reject the mainstream narrative of WW2."

I agree with you that Hitler was not The Ultimate Evil Of All Times and that we should reject the exceptionalism that is rammed down our throats, but can you really honestly portray him as just "not a nice guy"? Isn't there something in between "Ultimate Evil of All Times" and "not a nice guy" that would be more of a reasonable description? When I think of someone who is "not a nice guy", I think of some jerk who likes to cut in lines against his turn, maybe kicks cats who crosses his path, perhaps likes to start viscious rumors about people, and is a bit of a bully to get his way. Maybe your average politician or corporate executive who engages in false ad-hominem attacks against their opponents and is willing to step on people to get ahead would qualify as "not a nice guy" according to most people's sense of the term.

But, can someone who seizes power in a democratic system to then destroy it, uses mass brainwashing and terror to whip a population into a frenzy of hatred and war frenzy to then slaughter millions upon millions of people, mostly communists, or civilians of communist countries (even if it didn't include millions of jews) and rounds up and tortures and assassinates their political oponents, and uses countless human guinea pigs for conducting excruciatingly painful tests for everything from new methods of torture to drugs to biological and chemical warfare, etc., be just dismissed as just "not a nice guy"? Or, do you reject this entire part of the "mainstream narrative"?

Is the CIA just a bunch of "not nice guys", for that matter? Or, maybe the fact that Zionists control the CIA and not just the petty Nazis that started the CIA makes them really evil? What's the difference? I thought it was all the same. They're all a bunch of evil psychopaths. Whether they call themselves Nazis or Stalinists or Zionists or Maoists or whatever-ists, what does it matter, they're all about the same thing. As JFK remarked after he finally realized the kinds of people that were running the country were a totally different breed than himself, "These people have a collective death wish for humanity". He fiinally came face to face with the reality that there is a sub-species of humans that are very different than most of us with consciences. There are approximately 4% of humanity - psychopaths - that are effectively predators to the rest of humanity and will destroy us and all we hold dear unless we figure out a way to neutralize them or at least get them out of power.

"I realize now who the real haters are and I tell you with 100% assurance that the real evil in this world is worse than the Nazis, and has been far more successful. NOT Jews, but the elites behind both the Zionist project and the real fascism of monetary power in the hands of the few."

Hmm. Ok, is it Real Fascism vs Fake Fascism that you are distinguishing? I guess I'm a little confused. Is it about success vs unfullfilled dreams? Is it about body-count? Is one group of psychopaths, who didn't happen to get control of the banking matrix before the other group of psychopaths did, considered less evil regardless of the fact that their goals and purpose of existance is basically the same - ultimate power over and enslavement and torment of the masses?

By the way, I thought that 95% of your post was one of the most eloquant synopses of recent history I've ever heard. Maybe that should go into the wiki.