of the Controlled Fake Truth Movement

The actions of the controllers of this fake forum of the last few days have finally confirmed the worst fears of people who were still in doubt about whether or not the professional Shills have taken over apartment 911b. They've now made our job easier in identifying Shills. There's really no question anymore about the true motives and agenda of the Censors there.

I just found out I was banned yesterday from 911CensoredBlog. I hadn't even bothered to try getting any comments approved on that transparently-controlled site for at least 4 months now. I guess they needed to take a preemptive strike to purge all the remaining potential dissenters who might possibly vote down the masters like John Gold, RepreCensor, etc. Fucking pathetic! What a bunch of cowards and sleezebags? Actually, much worse, because they are guilty of aiding and abetting war criminals in their ongoing fraudulent 911 forum used to support the ongoing fraudulent War on Terror (Read: Halocaust Against the Arab/Muslim/Persian World).

Casseia, your statement above is eloquent and beautifully written, as usual.

Hello to Gretavo, Big-D, Scrubby, Jpass, Lazlo, Tahooey, and all my favorite bloggers here and rock on, great comments all!

I think we need to update Jon Gold's fake truthing script to include the names of RepreCensor and the other shills who are now adopting Gold's script in it's entirety:

from http://www.wtcdemolition.com/blog/node/196

Jon Gold's and [insert list of all his "shared brain" fellow shills] 9/11 (Un)Truthing Script

1) Attempt to divert people away from the evidence that most strongly supports MIHOP, ESPECIALLY any evidence that implicates Mossad/Zionist involvement, while exagerating about and going ON AND ON AND ON AND ON about the Al Queda/Patsystan/LIHOP non"evidence".

1A) WTC Controlled Demolition and Pentagon No Boeing evidence and any evidence that disproves that muslim hijackers were onboard the planes must be rejected or downplayed at all times. Shut down those who attempt to bring up this evidence. Those who discuss this evidence are to be accused of being agents, and/or of being divisive. If any of this type of MIHOP evidence becomes too universally accepted within the movement, such as what has happened with the WTC CD in the last few years, forget that he used to reject it, accuse anyone of being a liar who points out that Jon used to reject it, but still attempt to downplay it and pretend that he just doesn't understand the evidence and it is "speculative" (unlike the hijacker narrative that he is 100% sure of).

1B) "Contribute to the movement" (and make a name for yourself) by doing such things as writing letters to and dialoguing with the family members asking questions only about Patsystan in order to keep them focased only on Patsystan. If anybody disagrees with this naked attempt to contain the inquiry and keep influencial and well respected people, such as the family members, from looking beyond arabs/muslims, accuse such dissenters of disrespecting/not supporting family members, and/or being divisive, and or asking them "what have you contributed to the movement?"

1C) Don't allow any discussion of evidence that points to Israel/Zionists being behind 9/11. Accuse anybody who tries to discuss this evidence of being anti-semites, and/or of being divisive

2) How to deal with criticism of this script and arguments used against people who continue challenging Jon's tactics:

2A) Accuse dissenters of being agents
2B) Accuse those who disagree with and criticize Jon's tactics of lying
2C) Play the sympathy card - paint the disagreements and criticisms in terms of people unfairly attacking/victimizing Jon or orchestrating a vendetta
2D) Accuse people of keeping Jon from FINDING THE TRUTH, and keep repeating that he is "only attempting to FIND THE TRUTH"
2E) Accuse them of lying again
2F) Question the dissenter's motivations
2G) Claim that the dissenter only posts comments that attack good hard-working truthers such as Jon whether true or not (mostly not)
2H) Claim that the dissenter does not contribute anything to the truth movement whether true or not (mostly not)
2I) Name drop - Jon knows everybody who's anybody in the 9/11 truth movement [commence rolling eyes]
2J) Accuse them of lying again
2K) Attack the blatent disinfo types, such as the WTC No-Planers/Hologram types in order to show that Jon Himself couldn't possibly be disinfo agent
2L) Claim that Jon has contributed more blog posts than anybody else in the movement, and therefore is worth more than any other truther to the movement (pretending that only quantity, not quality, counts - i.e. disregarding the negative value that should be ascribed to contributions that serve to misdirect/distract people away from the true perpetrators of 9/11...how many posts about the alleged 100,000 wire transfer from Patsystan to Mohammed Atta reported in the Times of India do we really need?)
2M) Accuse the dissenters of dividing the movement (of course, Jon's divisive behavior must not ever be considered divisive)
2N) Accuse the dissenters of disrespecting/not supporting family members
2O) Claim that the dissenter needs to grow up
[quote="Jon Gold"]Grow up casseia. Either grow up, or find a new outlet that appreciates your kind of "work."[/quote]
2P) Demand that the dissenter "STOP LYING ABOUT ME"
2Q) If all else fails, support censorship, and when possible ban people who hurt Jon's feelings (or who refuse to go along with the script)

Just goes to show you that the more things change, the more those shilly shills stay the same!


To WTCDemolition.com newbies:

Think about this: What are the odds that all of the approximately 10-15 CD deniars among the millions of "seasoned 9/11 truthers" in the movement (that is, take 15 and divide by a conservative figure of 20 million) all hang out and censor the same 3 or 4 blog sites? Did you ever wonder why you never met a real live CD deniar in the real world, but you only ever hear of them on the internet? Do some math and you got your answer.